نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
دانش اموخته دکتری حقوق کیفری و جرم شناسی دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی تهران، ایران
چکیده
بزه دیدگی آنلاین پدیده‌ای نوظهور است که پیچیدگی‌های فراوانی نسبت به انواعی از بزهدیدگی در دنیای واقعی دارد. ناشناس بودن بزهکار و بزهدیده، بی‌معنا شدن مفهوم مرز، رنگ باختن اعتماد و سطح آسیب‌پذیری بالا از این موارد است. یکی از مهم‌ترین عواملی که بر این نوع بزهدیدگی تأثیرگذار است، تفاوتهای فرهنگی است. بر این مبنا، پژوهش حاضر به روش تحلیلی- توصیفی و با استفاده از ابزار کتابخانه‌ای به دنبال پاسخ به این پرسش است که تفاوتهای فرهنگی چگونه از حیث نظری می‌توانند تحلیل‌گر بزهدیدگی باشند و چه تأثیری در بروز بزهدیدگی در فضای آنلاین دارند. نظریاتی چون فعالیت روزمره، هویت اجتماعی، مدل قلدری آنلاین نژادی بارلت و نظریه‌‌ی ابعاد فرهنگی هافستد نشان دادند که این تفاوت‌ها می‌توانند در نوع تعاملات افراد با یکدیگر، شکل‌گیری هویت فرهنگی، تشویق ایدئولوژی‌های خاص بزهکارانه، میزان پذیرش رفتارهای بزهکارانه‌‌ی اعضای جامعه، ترویج اصل لذت و فرهنگ فردگرایی در مقابل جمع‌گرایی و در نهایت بروز بزهدیدگی نقش داشته باشند. همچنین، تأثیر تفاوتهای فرهنگی بر بروز بزهدیدگی آنلاین در چهار بعد تصور بزهدیدگی، نوع آن، تجربه‌‌ی بزهدیدگی و تکرار آن است. نتیجه آنکه توسعه‌‌ی برنامه‌ها و کارگاه‌های آموزشی، تقویت نظارت اجتماعی و روابط خانوادگی، ترویج هنجارهای اجتماعی مثبت و توسعه‌‌ی پلتفرم‌های آنلاین امن می‌تواند به پیشگیری از بزهدیدگی کمک کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
The Impact of Cultural Differences on Online Victimization
نویسنده [English]
- tahmineh shahpouri
PhD in criminal law and criminology, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran,Iran
چکیده [English]
Online victimization, as a growing phenomenon, presents unique challenges that differ significantly from traditional forms of victimization. Features such as the anonymity of both perpetrators and victims, the dissolution of geographical boundaries, reduced trust, and heightened vulnerability make cyberspace a distinctive environment for victimization. A key factor influencing this form of victimization is cultural differences, which play a pivotal role in the formation, experience, and recurrence of online victimization. Culture, a complex concept encompassing the beliefs, behaviors, customs, and values of a society, has been recognized since the 1990s, particularly in criminology and cultural criminology, as a significant structural factor.
Contemporary criminological approaches view culture and cultural factors as foundational causes of crime and victimization. Cultural criminology, in particular, argues that culture not only shapes criminal behavior but also influences societal reactions to crime and victimization. Modern media and online environments, by influencing social norms and perceptions, have created new contexts for criminal acts and victimization. These new settings present specific challenges for vulnerable groups, particularly children and adolescents, such as the promotion of violence, aggressive behaviors, and the erosion of positive social values.
This study adopts an analytical-descriptive approach, utilizing library resources to investigate the theoretical and practical aspects of this issue.
Theoretical Frameworks Explaining the Role of Cultural Differences in Online Victimization
Routine Activity Theory (RAT), proposed by Cohen and Felson, identifies three essential elements for victimization: motivated offenders, suitable targets, and capable guardianship. Cultural differences influence these components in various ways. For instance, some cultures exhibit greater tolerance toward aggressive online behaviors, and the levels of familial and social supervision over internet use can vary. Cultures that encourage the sharing of personal information increase their members’ vulnerability to online victimization.
Social Identity Theory emphasizes the role of group membership and cultural identity in how individuals experience victimization. People from diverse cultural backgrounds may experience victimization differently based on their group affiliations. Ethnic and racial minorities, for example, are disproportionately exposed to online harassment, and the social distance between groups can intensify feelings of isolation and vulnerability. Social groups that legitimize violent behavior may contribute to the perpetuation of victimization cycles.
The Barlett Gentile Cyberbullying Model (BGCM) focuses on the impact of learned attitudes, especially regarding anonymity and the diminished relevance of physical power in online spaces. Cultures with strong social norms, such as collectivist societies, tend to have lower rates of online bullying. Conversely, individualistic cultures, which emphasize personal autonomy, exhibit higher rates of online victimization. Positive attitudes toward online harassment, combined with a lack of accountability and weak social norm enforcement, increase individuals’ vulnerability.
Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions Theory identifies cultural dimensions such as individualism/collectivism, power distance, uncertainty avoidance, and masculinity/femininity, which all affect online interactions and the likelihood of victimization. For example, in high power distance cultures, individuals may be less likely to report victimization, while those in cultures with high uncertainty avoidance may engage less in risky online interactions.
Cultural Differences Impacting Online Victimization Across Four Dimensions
The perception of victimization varies across cultures. Cultural norms influence how individuals recognize and react to victimization, as well as how seriously it is perceived. What may be considered a minor offense in one culture could be viewed as a serious crime in another, depending on the societal values and norms.
The type of victimization also differs among cultures. Certain cultures may be more vulnerable to specific types of online victimization, such as cyberbullying, identity theft, or online harassment. These patterns are shaped by cultural tendencies toward technology use, communication styles, and the protection of personal information.
The experience of victimization and its impact on individuals are mediated by cultural factors. Some cultures may emphasize resilience and coping strategies, while others may foster feelings of shame or helplessness in response to victimization. For example, cultures with strong community support systems may encourage individuals to seek help and recover more quickly, while those without such systems may experience prolonged psychological effects.
Recurrence of victimization is influenced by cultural attitudes toward social supervision and support. In cultures with weaker social supervision or less emphasis on community support, individuals are more likely to experience repeated victimization. This lack of support can exacerbate the negative effects of online victimization and contribute to cycles of re-victimization.
Practical Implications and Recommendations
This study highlights the need for culturally sensitive approaches in addressing online victimization. Educational programs and awareness workshops should be tailored to cultural contexts to effectively reduce the occurrence of online victimization. Measures such as enhancing social and familial supervision, promoting positive social norms, and creating secure online platforms are essential. These interventions must take cultural differences into account to be truly effective in mitigating online victimization.
Furthermore, a deeper understanding of cultural factors is crucial for designing effective prevention strategies that not only reduce victimization but also enhance the mental health and safety of individuals navigating digital environments. Cultural sensitivity in both policy-making and interventions is key to reducing online harm and supporting the well-being of vulnerable groups, such as children, adolescents, and marginalized communities.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Victim
- victimization
- online victimization
- cultural differences
- re-victimization
- prevention
- آقایی، محسن،« نقش رسانه در بزهکاری کودکان و نوجوانان و تبیین راهکارهای پیشگیری در پرتو نظریه جرم‌شناسی رشدمدار»، فصلنامه حقوق کودک، دوره 3، شماره 12، (زمستان 1400)
- جوکز، ایون، ، رسانه و جرم، ترجمه ی محمدتقی نوری، چاپ اول، تهران، انتشارات مجد،(1394)
- عرب، روحانی مقدم، خاقانی اصفهانی، مجتبی، محمد، مهدی، آموزه‌های جرم‌شناسی فرهنگی و ارتباط آن با ارتکاب جرم، فصلنامه فقه جزای تطبیقی، دوره 1، شماره 5، (اسفند 1400)
- کلونجر، ناوارو، مالکوم، هینگیز، جوردانا، شلی، کاترین، جرج، ، شناخت بزهدیده شناسی؛ رویکردی مبتنی بر یادگیری کنشی، ترجمه بشریه، شاهپوری، چلبی، هژبرالساداتی، رایجیان اصلی، تهمورث، تهمینه، ارژنگ، هانیه، مهرداد، تهران، نشر نگاه معاصر. (1402)
- ماتیو، ویلیامز، بزهکاری مجازی: بزه، انحراف و مقرّرات گذاری برخط، مترجمان جلالـی فراهـانی و منفرد، امیرحسین، محبوبه، چاپ اول، تهران، نشر میزان (1391 )
In Persia
- Aghaei, Mohsen, "The Role of Media in Juvenile Delinquency and Explanation of Preventive Strategies in Light of Developmental Criminology Theory," Child Rights Quarterly, Vol. 3, No. 12, Winter 2021.
- Jewkes, Yvonne,Media and Crime, translated by Mohammad Taghi Nouri, First Edition, Tehran, Majd Publications, 2015.
- Arab, Rouhani Moghaddam, Khaghani Esfahani, Mojtaba, Mohammad, Mehdi, "Teachings of Cultural Criminology and Its Relation to Crime Commission," Comparative Criminal Jurisprudence Quarterly, Vol. 1, No. 5, March 2022.
- Shelly Clevenger, Jordana N. Navarro, Catherine D. Marcum, George E. Higgins,Victimology: An Approach Based on Active Learning, translated by Bashiriyeh, Shahpouri, Chalabi, Hojabrolsadati, Rayejian Asli, Tahmoores, Tahmineh, Arzhang, Hanieh, Mehrdad, Tehran, Contemporary View Publishing, 2024.
- Matthew, Williams,Cybercrime: Crime, Deviance, and Online Regulation, translated by Jalali Farahani and Monfared, Amir Hossein, Mahbubeh, First Edition, Tehran, Mizan Publishing, 2012.
ب. انگلیسی
- Aarushi H. Shah et al, (2024)Coping Strategies and Help-Seeking Behaviors among Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence: A Qualitative Study of Spouses of Men with Heavy Drinking in India, 14 january 2025 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/6839787
- Barlett C, Chamberlin K, Witkower Z., Predicting cyberbullying perpetration in emerging adults: A theoretical test of the Barlett Gentile Cyberbullying Model. Aggress Behav. 43(2):147-154. (2017 Apr)
- doi: 10.1002/ab.21670. Epub 2016 Sep 7. PMID: 27605394.
- Barlett, C.P., Seyfert, L.W., Simmers, M.M., Hsueh Hua Chen, V., Cavalcanti, J.G., Krahé, B., Suzuki, K., Warburton, W.A., Wong, R.Y.M., Pimentel, C.E. and Skowronski, MCross‐cultural similarities and differences in the theoretical predictors of cyberbullying perpetration: Results from a seven‐ country study. Aggressive behavior, 47(1), 111-119. . (2021). DOI: 10.1002/ab.21923
- Coping through acceptance: Intimate partner violence and attitudes dynamics. Guest post by Eugenia Frezza. DECEMBER 05, (2023) https://blogs.worldbank.org
- Corbett ,Emily, et al, The normalisation of sexual violence revictimisation in regional and rural areas: Our failure to respond, The Australian journal of social issues 59(2), 1-19, (November 2023), DOI: 10.1002/ajs4.297
- Cuadrado-Gordillo I, Martín-Mora-Parra Influence of Cross-Cultural Factors about Sexism, Perception of Severity, Victimization, and Gender Violence in Adolescent Dating Relationships. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 19;19(16):10356 (2022 Aug) . doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610356. PMID: 36011995; PMCID: PMC9408226.
- Farrell ,Graham, WilliamREPEAT VICTIMIZATION AND HOT SPOTS: THE OVERLAP AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR CRIME CONTROL AND PROBLEM-ORIENTED POLICING, Crime Prevention Studies, volume 12. ,(2001)
- Geoffrion S, Goncalves J, Boyer R, Marchand A, Guay S. The Effects of Trivialization of Workplace Violence on Its Victims: Profession and Sex Differences in a Cross-Sectional Study among Healthcare and Law Enforcement Workers. Ann Work Expo Health. 1;61(3):369-382. (2017 Apr) doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxx003. PMID: 28355455; PMCID: PMC6824521.
- Guedes I, Martins M, Cardoso CS. Exploring the determinants of victimization and fear of online identity theft: an empirical study. Secur J. 21:1– (2022) doi: 10.1057/s41284-022-00350-5. Epub ahead of print. PMCID: PMC9302955.
- Haleem, Irm, Normalization of Violence Conceptual Analysis and Reflections from Asia, Routledge,(2021)
- Hofstede, Geert, Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context, vol2, theoretical and methodological issues,1-26 ( 2011)
- Hamby, Sherry & Blount, Zach & Taylor, Elizabeth & Mitchell, Kimberly & Jones, LisaThe Association of Different Cyber-Victimization Types With Current Psychological and Health Status in Southern Appalachian Communities. Violence and Victims. 36. . (2020). Doi: 10.1891/VV-D-18-00214.
- https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/culture
- Lazarus RS, Toward better research on stress and coping. American psychologist;55(6):665-73. (2000),
- MALAKI, ZOI explaining online victimization for the cases of social identity theory, (2021)· , https://www.divaorg/smash/get/diva2:1600779/FULLTEXT02
- Morillo Puente, Solbey, Cyber victimization within the Routine Activity Theory Framework in the Digital Age, Revista de Psicología 40(1):p265, ,(2022) DOI:10.18800/psico.202201.009
- Rodríguez-Hidalgo, Antonio J. et al, Ethnic-Cultural Bullying Versus Personal Bullying: Specificity and Measurement of Discriminatory Aggression and Victimization Among Adolescents, Front. Psychol. Vol 10,1-12. (2019)
- Schultze-Krumbholz, Anja, Pfetsch, Jan.S. Lietz, Katrin, Cyberbullying in a Multicultural Context—Forms, Strain, and Coping Related to Ethnicity-Based Cybervictimization, Sec. Culture and Communication, Front. Commun., 10 Volume 7 –1-13 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.846794
- Wei J, Candini M, Menabò L, Guarini A, Rubini M, Frassinetti F. Belonging matters: The impact of social identification with classmates, friends, and family on interpersonal distance and bullying/cyberbullying in adolescence. PLoS One. 6;19(2):e0297370. (2024) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297370. PMID: 38319947; PMCID: PMC10846719.
- Weinstein M, Jensen MR, Tynes BM. Victimized in many ways: Online and offline bullying/harassment and perceived racial discrimination in diverse racial-ethnic minority adolescents. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor, Psychol. 2021 Jul;27(3):397-407. (2021) doi: 10.1037/cdp0000436. Epub PMID: 34043397; PMCID: PMC8754584.
- Weir, Ruth, , Differentiating risk: The association between relationship type and risk of repeat victimization of domestic abuse, Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, Volume 18, paae024, (2024) https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paae024
- Williams, Matthew L. Guardians Upon High: An Application of Routine Activities Theory to Online Identity Theft in Europe at the Country and Individual Level, The British Journal of Criminology, Volume 56, Issue 1, Pages 21–48, (2016) https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azv011
- Ybarra ML, Mitchell KJ, Oppenheim JK. Violent Media in Childhood and Seriously Violent Behavior in Adolescence and Young Adulthood. J Adolesc Health. 71(3):285-292. (2022), doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.03.003. Epub 2022 May 9. PMID: 35550330; PMCID: PMC10177625.
- Żemojtel-Piotrowska, Magdalena, Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions Theory, In book: Encyclopedia of Sexual Psychology and Behavior, pp.1-4, ( 2023)
)