نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری فقه و حقوق جزا، دانشگاه شهید مطهری واحد تهران، تهران، ایران

2 استادیار گروه فقه و حقوق جزا، دانشگاه شهید مطهری واحد تهران، تهران، ایران

3 دانشیار گروه فقه و حقوق خصوصی، دانشگاه شهید مطهری واحد تهران، تهران، ایران

4 استاد گروه فقه و حقوق خصوصی، دانشگاه شهید مطهری واحد تهران، تهران، ایران

چکیده

امروزه موضوع سرقت هویت مورد توجه رسانه‌ها و افکار عمومی قرار گرفته و به ‌‌عنوان یکی از سریع‌ترین جرایم در حال رشد در سطح جهانی شناخته می‌شود. این مسئله در سطح داخلی و بین‌المللی حائز اهمیت است و می‌تواند عنصری محوری در جرائم فراملی باشد. در این پدیده‌‌ی مجرمانه که عمدتاً به ‌منظور کلاهبرداری انجام می‌شود، فردی هویت متعلق به غیر را بدون آگاهی او مورد استفاده قرار می‌دهد و این موضوع به چالشی بزرگ برای جوامع عصر دیجیتال تبدیل شده است؛ قربانیان این جرم، خسارات مالی و روانی فاجعه‌باری را تجربه می‌کنند و پیامدهای آن برای جامعه بسیار گسترده است. از این‌ رو، در سال‌های اخیر، حوزه‌های قضایی استرالیا نیاز به تصویب جرایمی تحت عنوان جرایم هویتی را احساس کرده ‌اند. این مطالعه با روش توصیفی-تحلیلی و بهره‌گیری از منابع کتابخانه‌ای، ضمن تبیین مفهوم سرقت هویت و مبانی جرم‌انگاری آن، به بررسی و نقد جرایم مقرر در حقوق استرالیا می‌پردازد. یافته‌های پژوهش حاضر نشان می‌دهد که قانونگذاران استرالیا هنوز سرقت هویت را به‌‌ طور دقیق جرم‌انگاری نکرده ‌اند بلکه بیشتر به پیشگیری از آسیب‌های اجتماعی و خساراتی که ممکن است در نتیجه‌‌ی سوءاستفاده از اطلاعات شناسایی حاصل شود، توجه داشته‌ اند. درک جرایم هویتی و بازنگری قوانین برای مقابله مؤثر با آن، پیام اصلی این مطالعه است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Australian Criminal Justice System’s Approach to the Criminalization of Identity Theft

نویسندگان [English]

  • Meysam Abbasi Lahroudi 1
  • Mohammad Rasaei 2
  • Mohammad Bahrami Khoshkar 3
  • Seyyed Abolghasem Naghibi 4

1 Ph.D. student of Jurisprudence and Criminal Law, Tehran University of Shahid Motahari, Tehran, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Jurisprudence and Criminal Law, Tehran University of Shahid Motahari, Tehran, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of Jurisprudence and Private Law, Tehran University of Shahid Motahari, Tehran, Iran.

4 Professor, Department of Jurisprudence and Private Law, Tehran University of Shahid Motahari, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Identity theft has become a prominent issue in both media and public discourse and is recognized as one of the fastest-growing crimes globally. It is a national and international concern and often plays a central role in transnational crimes. Typically committed for the purpose of fraud, identity theft involves an individual using another person’s identity without their knowledge, posing a major challenge in the digital age. While identity-related crimes are not new, the digital era's increased access to and reliance on personal information has significantly facilitated their rise and ease of execution.
Perpetrators commonly use stolen personal information to withdraw money from bank accounts, open new accounts, or access services such as healthcare under the victim's identity. One of the most alarming aspects of identity theft is the broad spectrum of potential victims—including governments, companies, and individuals across all ages, genders, educational backgrounds, and income levels. The consequences can be severe, ranging from financial loss and psychological harm to a damaged credit rating, false criminal records, and extensive time and effort required to restore one's financial and legal standing.
In Australia, identity crime has recently emerged as a pressing issue within the criminal justice system, imposing significant costs on the national economy and often serving as a facilitator for more serious offences such as terrorism and human trafficking. In response, Australian authorities have undertaken considerable efforts to study identity crime and develop relevant laws at both federal and state levels.
This article represents the first study in our country to examine Australian laws on identity crime. By focusing on the criminalization of identity theft, the research contributes to broader criminal law scholarship. Analyzing the current legal frameworks used to prosecute identity crimes is essential for developing effective deterrents and guiding law enforcement responses. Employing a descriptive-analytical method and relying on library resources, this study explains the concept of identity theft, explores the principles underpinning its criminalization, critically reviews Australian statutes, highlights the key features of different legal approaches, and identifies fundamental differences across jurisdictions.
The study’s findings indicate that, despite increasing concern about the damaging consequences of identity theft, Australian jurisdictions have not yet fully criminalized the offence. Instead, the legal focus remains on preventing broader social harm through predicate offences—such as possessing or trading identity information—that lack clear mental elements tied to the accused's intent. These offences are not only overly broad in scope but also rest on a problematic theoretical foundation centered around the mere possession of information. This breadth shifts the responsibility of defining criminal boundaries from legislators to law enforcement, which risks undermining core principles of fairness and justice in criminal law. Consequently, secondary offences may overshadow the primary crimes they are meant to support.
Systematic efforts are needed to clearly define prohibited activities and avoid vague or misleading terminology. There must be a careful balance between protecting society and avoiding over-criminalization. To that end, lawmakers should provide clear, rational justifications for criminalizing specific behaviors. A standardized legal definition of identity crimes—something international bodies have yet to achieve—is crucial. Such a definition should incorporate the essential elements of identity crimes, including acquisition, production, transfer, possession, and use of identity information. Establishing this foundation is vital for understanding identity theft and formulating effective prevention, prosecution, and compensation strategies.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Criminal justice system
  • Australia
  • Criminalization
  • Identity theft
  • Identity crimes
  • برهانی، محسن (1388). «سیاست کیفری ایران در قبال روسپیگری»، فصلنامه‌‌ی مطالعات راهبردی زنان، دوره‌‌ی 12، شماره‌‌ی 45، 7-42.
  • روسو، ژان ژاک (1366). قرارداد اجتماعی یا اصول حقوق سیاسی، چاپ سوم، ترجمه‌‌ی منوچهر کیا، تهران، گنجینه.
  • سلیمان دهکردی، الهام و حیدریان، ارشیاناز (1398). «تبیین سرقت هویت در نظام کیفری ایران»، پژوهشنامه‌‌ی حقوق فارس، دوره‌‌ی 2، شماره‌‌ی 2، 63-85.
  • صالح‌‌آبادی، زهرا (1391). جرایم علیه هویت با تأکید بر فضای سایبر، پایان‌‌نامه‌‌ی کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده‌‌ی حقوق دانشگاه قم.
  • کاتوزیان، ناصر (1400). فلسفه‌‌ی حقوق، جلد اول، چاپ دوم، تهران، گنج دانش.
  • محمودی جانکی، فیروز (1393). «جرم‌انگاری حق‌مدار؛ با تأکید بر نظریه‌‌ی آلمانی مصالح حقوقی»، فصلنامه‌‌ی پژوهش حقوق کیفری، دوره‌‌ی 3، شماره‌‌ی 9، 83-110.

ب. انگلیسی

  • Ahmed, S. M. S. (2019). Identity Crime in the Digital Age: Malaysian and Mauritanian Legal Frameworks. International Journal of Law, Government and Communication, 4(15), 154-165. DOI: 10.35631/ijlgc.4150016
  • Ahmed, Syed R. (2020). Preventing Identity Crime: Identity Theft and Identity Fraud: An Identity Crime Model and Legislative Analysis with Recommendations for Preventing Identity Crime. Leiden; Boston: Brill Nijhoff.
  • Alleyne, O. (2014). Criminalising Identity Theft: A Comparative Study of Barbados, England and Australia. Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. University of Leicester.
  • Ashworth, A. (2006). Principles of Criminal 5th edn. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Australasian Centre for Policing Research (ACPR) (2006). Standardisation of Definitions of Identity Crime Terms: A Step towards Consistency. Report Series No. 145.3, Commonwealth of Australia.
  • Australian Institute of Criminology (AIC). (2002). Identity Newsletter, Summer/Autumn, No. 17.
  • Council of Australian Governments (COAG). (2007). An Agreement to a National Identity Security Strategy. Australia Government.
  • Cuganesan, S., & Lacey, D. (2003). Identity Fraud in Australia: An Evaluation of its Nature, Cost and Extent. Securities Industry Research Centre of Asia-Pacific (SIRCA). Sydney: Standards Australia International & Business Excellence Australia.
  • Dixon, N. (2005). Identity Fraud. Research Brief No 2005/03, Queensland Parliamentary Library.
  • Duff, R.A. (2005). ‘Criminalizing Endangerment’ in A. Duff, & S.P. Green (eds), Defining Crimes: Essays on the Special Part of the Criminal Law. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Gercke, (2011). Legal Approaches to Criminalize Identity Theft. In United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), Handbook on Identity-related Crime. New York: United Nations.
  • Higgins, C. (2009). Crimes Amendment (Identity Crime) Bill Research Brief No 1, Victoria Parliamentary Library Research Service.
  • Husak, D. (2008). Overcriminalization: The Limits of the Criminal Law. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
  • International Centre for Criminal Law Reform and Criminal Justice Policy (ICCLR). (2011). Responding to Victims of Identity Crime: A Manual for Law Enforcement Agents, Prosecutors and Policy-Makers. available at: http://www.icclr.law. ubc.ca.
  • Jain, M., & Bajaj, P. (2014). Techniques in Detection and Analyzing Malware Executables: A Review. IJCSMC, 3(5), 930-935.
  • Jaishankar, K. (2008). Identity related Crime in the Cyberspace: Examining Phishing and its impact. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 2(1), 10–15.
  • Komakula, S., & Jagadeeshwar, M. (2021). Identity Theft in Cyber Security: Literature Survey. Strad Research, 8(9), 104 – 109. DOI: 10.37896/sr8.9/014
  • Kumar, S., & Agarwal, D. (2018). Hacking Attacks, Methods, Techniques and Their Protection IJSART, 4(4), 2253-2257.
  • Lawson, (2011). Identity-related Crime Victim Issues: A Discussion Paper. In United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), Handbook on Identity-related Crime. New York: United Nations.
  • Leader-Elliott, I. (2011). Framing Preparatory Inchoate Offences in the Criminal Code: The Identity Crime Debacle. Criminal Law Journal, Vol. 35, 80-97. University of Adelaide Law School Research Paper No. 2011-012.
  • Lozusic, (2003). Fraud and Identity Theft. Briefing Paper No 8/03, NSW Parliamentary Library Research Service.
  • Martins de Almeida, G. (2011). Typology and Criminalization Approaches to Identity-related Crime: Compendium of Examples of Relevant Legislation. In United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), Handbook on Identity-related Crime. New York: United Nations.
  • Model Criminal Law Officers’ Committee (MCLOC). (2008). Final Report: Identity Crime. Commonwealth of Australia.
  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2008). Scoping Paper on Online Identity Theft, DSTI/CP(2007)3/FINAL, Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry.
  • Packer, H.L. (1968). The Limits of the Criminal California: Stanford University Press.
  • Steel, A. (2010). The True Identity of Australian Identity Theft Offences: A Measured Response or  an Unjustified Status Offence? University of New South Wales Law Journal, 33(2), 503-531.
  • Sullivan, C. (2011). Digital Identity: An Emergent Legal South Australia: University of Adelaide Press.
  • Wang, K., & Huang, W. (2011). The Evolutional View of the Types of Identity Thefts and Online Frauds in the Era of the Internet. Internet Journal of Criminology. available at: http:// www.internetjournalofcriminology.com
  • Zulhuda, S., & Mohamed, S. M. O. (2015). The Shari’ah Approach to Criminalise Identity Theft. Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. & Hum, 23 (S), 169-182.

 

References

  • Borhani, Mohsen (2009). "Iran's Criminal Policy Against Prostitution", Quarterly Journal of Strategic Women's Studies, Volume 12, Issue 45, 7-42. (In Persia)
  • Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1987). The Social Contract or Principles of Political Law, Third Edition, Translated by Manouchehr Kia, Tehran: Ganjineh. (In Persia)
  • Soliman Dehkordi, Elham and Heydarian, Arshianaz (2019). "Explaining Identity Theft in the Iranian Penal System", Persian Law Research Journal, Volume 2, Issue 2, 63-85. (In Persia)
  • Salehabadi, Zahra (2013). Crimes against Identity with Emphasis on Cyber Environment, Master's Thesis, Faculty of Law, University of Qom. (In Persia)
  • Katouzian, Naser (2021). Philosophy of Law, Volume 1, Second Edition, Tehran: Ganj Danesh. (In Persia)
  • Mahmoudi Janaki, Firouz (2015). "Right-Orientation in Criminalization; With Emphasis on the German Theory of Legal Interests", Journal of Criminal Law Research, Volume 3, Number 9, 83-110. (In Persia)