نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکترای حقوق کیفری و جرمشناسی، دانشکده‌‌ی ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران.
2 استادیار، گروه حقوق جزا و جرمشناسی، دانشگاه گیلان، گیلان، ایران
3 استادیار گروه روان‌‌شناسی، پژوهشکده‌‌ی اخلاق و تربیت پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
اختلال روانی استرس پس از سانحه (PTSD) یک اختلال روانی است که در اثر تماس با موقعیت‌های تهدیدکننده‌‌ی حیات به وجود می‌آید. این نوشتار که به روش توصیفی و تحلیلی نگارش شده است، درصدد پاسخ به این پرسش است که آیا در کشور ایران و آمریکا این اختلال می‌تواند به عنوان یک دفاع کیفری مطرح شود یا خیر. یافته‌ها نشان دادند در نظام عدالت قضایی آمریکا، متهمان ممکن است ادعا کنند که این اختلال بر کنترل رفتارشان تأثیر گذاشته است. این ادعا از طریق گواهی کارشناسان مربوط ارزیابی می‌شود و این دسته از بیماران روانی در صورت اثبات، ممکن است از مجازات معاف شوند و یا در مجازات ایشان تخفیف حاصل گردد. اما در نظام قضایی ایران، مرتکب، با توجه به ماده‌‌ی 149ق.م.ا درصورتی‌که فاقد اراده یا فاقد قوه‌‌ی تمییز باشد مجنون محسوب می‌شود و مسئولیت کیفری ندارد و در صورتی که فاقد این شروط باشد مسئولیت کیفری تام داشته و برخلاف نظام قضایی آمریکا، مسئولیت کیفری نقصان یافته، صراحتاً مورد پذیرش قرار نگرفته است؛ اگرچه در جرایم تعزیری، مقررات عام تخفیف و نهادهای ارفاقی دیگری از جمله مجازات جایگزین حبس، تعویق صدور حکم، تعلیق اجرای مجازات به چشم می‌خورد؛ اما از این حیث که قضات ملزم به اجرای مفاد این معاذیر نیستند با انتقاد مواجه است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
Assessing the Role of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in Criminal Responsibility: A Comparative Study of Iranian and U.S. Judicial Systems
نویسندگان [English]
- mohammad hassani 1
- Hassan Shahmalekpour 2
- Abbas Salmanpour 2
- Esmaeil Naseri 3
1 PhD student in Criminal Law and Criminology, faculty of literature and humanities,, University of Guilan,, Rasht, Iran
2 Assistant Professor ,Criminal Law and Criminology,University of Guilan,Guilan,iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Ethics and Education Research Institute, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is a chronic and debilitating mental health condition triggered by exposure to highly traumatic or life-threatening events such as war, sexual assault, physical abuse, or natural disasters. It is characterized by symptoms including intrusive memories or flashbacks, avoidance of trauma-related stimuli, emotional numbing, heightened arousal, irritability, and significant disturbances in sleep. Beyond these symptoms, PTSD often leads to maladaptive behaviors such as substance abuse, aggression, and in some cases, suicidal tendencies. Given its pervasive impact, PTSD is recognized not only as a psychological disorder but also as a significant factor influencing social behavior and criminal conduct. This study employs a descriptive-analytical approach to investigate the role of PTSD as a criminal defense within the judicial frameworks of Iran and the United States. This is particularly important given the high prevalence of PTSD among trauma-affected populations, such as Iranian veterans of the Iran-Iraq War, where prevalence rates range between 15% and 39%. Understanding how PTSD influences criminal behavior and how judicial systems respond to this condition is crucial for ensuring justice and appropriate legal treatment for affected individuals.
Nature and Characteristics of PTSD
PTSD develops after direct exposure to or witnessing traumatic events. It is especially prevalent among war veterans—such as those who served in Vietnam, Iraq, or the Iran-Iraq War—survivors of interpersonal violence, and victims of natural disasters. According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), the disorder’s core symptoms include re-experiencing trauma through vivid flashbacks or nightmares, deliberate avoidance of trauma reminders, emotional detachment or numbing, and persistent hyperarousal manifesting as irritability, anger outbursts, or sleep difficulties. These symptoms can significantly disrupt daily functioning, often leading to impulsive or violent behaviors, which are further aggravated by concurrent substance abuse. Empirical research shows that PTSD profoundly affects social relationships, family dynamics, and occupational performance, contributing to increased rates of divorce, parenting challenges, and co-occurring depression. The chronic and progressive nature of PTSD means that without appropriate treatment, symptoms often worsen, escalating risks of self-harm, aggression, and other adverse outcomes, underscoring the importance of its consideration in legal contexts.
PTSD and Criminal Behavior
The relationship between PTSD and criminal behavior is complex and operates through multiple pathways. First, individual symptoms such as emotional instability, impulsivity, and irritability can directly trigger aggressive or violent acts. For example, individuals suffering from PTSD may respond impulsively to perceived threats or stressors, occasionally resulting in criminal conduct. Additionally, attempts to self-medicate traumatic memories through substance abuse can exacerbate these tendencies. Second, environmental factors linked to traumatic backgrounds—such as combat exposure, histories of sexual abuse, or residence in high-crime communities—can further destabilize behavior and increase the risk of criminal activity. Studies indicate that nearly 46% of veterans with PTSD engaged in violent acts within a year, with 37% repeating such behaviors. Women exposed to violence, especially those with PTSD, also display higher rates of criminal involvement, highlighting the intersection of trauma and criminality.
PTSD in the U.S. Judicial System
The U.S. judicial system acknowledges PTSD as a factor relevant to criminal responsibility in various ways. One significant application is through the insanity defense, specifically under the M’Naghten Rule, which allows for acquittal if the defendant was unable to understand the nature or wrongfulness of their actions due to mental illness. Notable cases such as State v. Cocuzza, involving a Vietnam veteran, and Commonwealth v. Tracy have seen successful use of PTSD as a basis for insanity acquittals. Conversely, cases like United States v. Duggan and United States v. Whitehead demonstrate that insufficient clinical evidence can lead to rejection of such defenses.
The automatism defense, which argues that the defendant acted unconsciously due to PTSD-related dissociation or other symptoms, has also been accepted in appellate courts, as seen in People v. Lisnow and State v. Fields. Additionally, PTSD-related syndromes such as battered woman syndrome have been successfully invoked in self-defense claims, especially where the defendant faced imminent danger, as in State v. Kelly and Rogers v. State.
Even when PTSD does not absolve criminal responsibility, it often serves as a mitigating factor reducing sentencing severity. For instance, in In re Nunez, a life sentence was overturned due to failure to consider PTSD, while in United States v. Cope, full criminal responsibility was maintained despite the presence of PTSD, illustrating variable judicial discretion.
PTSD in the Iranian Judicial System
Iran’s judicial system currently exhibits a more limited and rigid approach to PTSD in criminal law. The Islamic Penal Code (2013), particularly Article 149, allows exemption from criminal responsibility solely in cases where the defendant completely lacks willpower or discernment due to mental illness, effectively limiting considerations to cases of legal insanity. This binary distinction ignores the complexities of partial impairments such as PTSD, thus excluding many affected individuals from appropriate legal recognition.
Article 153 provides exemptions for involuntary acts performed during sleep or unconscious states, which could apply to some PTSD-related automatism, but this remains largely unexplored. While self-defense is acknowledged under Article 156, the strict necessity and proportionality criteria restrict its application, especially regarding psychological conditions like battered woman syndrome, which is more flexibly treated in common law jurisdictions.
Furthermore, Iran lacks formal recognition of diminished responsibility for sub-insanity disorders like PTSD. Although Articles 37 and 38 allow judges discretionary power to reduce sentences, these provisions are vague and rarely emphasize mental disorders that do not meet full insanity criteria. Alternative legal mechanisms, such as alternative punishments (Article 64), deferred sentencing (Article 40), suspension of prosecution (Article 81 of the Criminal Procedure Code), and exemption from punishment (Article 39), could theoretically support PTSD defendants, but their discretionary use and absence of clear guidelines limit their practical effectiveness.
Conclusion
Comparing the two systems, the U.S. judiciary demonstrates greater flexibility and clinical integration in addressing PTSD as a criminal defense through insanity, automatism, self-defense, and mitigating sentencing factors. Conversely, the Iranian system’s strict application of insanity standards and lack of diminished responsibility frameworks result in limited acknowledgment of PTSD’s impact on criminal behavior, with no documented cases explicitly involving PTSD defenses.
To promote justice and therapeutic outcomes for PTSD-affected offenders in Iran, judicial reforms are recommended. These include formal recognition of diminished criminal responsibility for sub-insanity disorders, mandatory sentencing reductions for specific mental health conditions, expansion of alternative sentencing options, and revision of existing penal provisions to emphasize defendants’ psychological states. Such changes would align Iranian criminal law more closely with contemporary understandings of PTSD’s psychological complexities and foster a more equitable, humane judicial response.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
- Criminal Responsibility
- Insanity
- Self-Defense
- Diminished Responsibility
- Iranian Judicial System
- U.S. Judicial System
- باچر، جیمز؛ مینکا، سوزان؛ هولی ، جیل (1395). آسیب شناسی روانی، ترجمه یحیی سید محمدی، جلد اول، چاپ هفتم، تهران، نشر ارسباران.
- جعفری، فریدون؛ صاحب بیاتی، سهیل (1402).« اندیشه کیفری قانون گذار در رابطه با مبتلایان اختلالات روانی با تأکید بر لایحه حمایت از حقوق افراد مبتلا به اختلال روانی»، مجله پژوهشهای حقوق جزا و جرمشناسی، دوره یازدهم، شماره بیست و دوم.
- حبیب زاده، محمد جعفر؛ میرمجیدی، سپیده (1391). «دفاع مشروع در پرتو زنان کتک خورده»، نشریه علمی و پژوهشی فقه و حقوق اسلامی»، سال دوم، شماره چهارم.
- دارابی، شهرداد (1398). بزهکاری یقه سرخ ها، تهران، نشر میزان.
- رحمت، محمد رضا، آشوری، محمد؛ مهدوی ثابت، محمد علی؛ شیری ورنا مخواستی، عباس (1398). «افتراقی شدن مرحله تحقیق در خصوص متهمین بیمار»، نشریه حقوق پزشکی، سال سیزدهم، شماره پنجاه.
- زمانی، ساسان؛ ویسانی، یوسف؛ محمدیان، فتح الله (1397). «بررسی شیوع اختلال استرس پس از سانحه در افراد با تجربه جنگ تحمیلی عراق بر ایران در استان ایلام در سال 1395: یک مطالعه مقطعی»، مجله طب نظامی، دوره بیستم، شماره چهارم، شماره پیاپی هفتاد و شش.
- شکری، رضا، (1396). قانون مجازات اسلامی در نظم کنونی، جلد اول، تهران، چاپ سوم، انتشارات مهاجر.
- علیمردانی، آرمین؛ راجیان اصلی، مهرداد، مصطفی، واحدی؛ میرحامد، خانی (1396)، « نقش اختلال روانی منجر به رفتار مجرمانه بر درجات مسئولیت جنایی، مجله علمی سازمان نظام پزشکی جمهوری اسلامی ایران»، دوره سی و پنج، شماره یک.
- فرحی، مریم (1403). « سندرم کتک خورده و دفاع مشروع : اختلافی قانونی و تجربی»، تمدن حقوقی، دوره هفتم ، شماره نوزدهم.
- کرینگ، آن م؛ دیویسون، جرالد س، نیل، جان م؛ جانسون، شری ل (1388). آسیب شناسی روانی، جلد اول، ترجمه حمید شمسی پور، با مقدمه دکتر محمود دژکام، چاپ چهارم، تهران، انتشارات ارجمند.
- کومر، رونالد (1400). روان شناسی نابهنجاری، جلد اول، ترجمه دکتر فاطمه دهقانی آرانی و دکتر رضا رستمی، چاپ اول، انتشارات دانشگاه تهران، تهران.
- گلدوزیان، ایرج،(1393) محشای قانون مجازات اسلامی،تهران، چاپ سوم، انتشارات مجد.
- میرسعیدی، منصور؛ غلامی، نبی‌الله (1397). « اختلال شخصیت دوقطپی ازمنظر حدود مسئولیت کیفری»، پژوهش حقوق کیفری، سال ششم، شمار بیست و دوم.
- نوربها ، رضا (1396) . زمینه حقوق جزای عمومی . تهران، چاپ سی چهارم، انتشارات میزان.
- هالجین، ریچارد پی؛ ویتبورن، سوزان کراس (1385). آسیب شناسی روانی، دیدگاهای بالینی درباره اختلال های روانی، جلد اول، ترجمه یحیی سید محمدی، چاپ سوم ، تهران: نشر روان.
- یکرنگی، محمد؛ جهانگیری، نیما؛ جهانگیری، نعیم (1402). «پاسخ کیفری مناسب به مجرمان دارای افسردگی »، فصلنامه حقوق پزشکی، دوره هفدهم، شماره پنجاه و هشتم.
ب. انگلیسی
- Adams, Z. W., McCart, M. R., Zajac, K., Danielson, C. K., Sawyer, G. K., Saunders, B. E., & Kilpatrick, D. G. (2013). Psychiatric problems and trauma exposure in nondetained delinquent and nondelinquent adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 42(3), 323-331.
- Adamou, M. C., & Hale, A. S. (2003). PTSD and the law of psychiatric injury in England and Wales: finally coming closer? PubMed, 31(3), 327–332. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14584532.
- Ardino, V. (2012). Offending behaviour: The role of trauma and PTSD. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 3(1), 18968.
- Berger, O., McNiel, D. E., & Binder, R. L. (2012). PTSD as a criminal defense: a review of case law. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 40(4), 509-521.
- Bottalico, B., & Bruni, T. (2012). Post traumatic stress disorder, neuroscience, and the law. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 35(2), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.12.001.
- Bryant, R. A., O’Donnell, M. L., Creamer, M., McFarlane, A. C., & Silove, D. (2010). Posttraumatic intrusive symptoms across psychiatric disorders. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 45(6), 842–847.
- Cohen, Z. E., & Appelbaum, P. S. (2016). Experience and Opinions of Forensic Psychiatrists Regarding PTSD in Criminal Cases. PubMed, 44(1), 41–52. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26944743.
- Donley, M. S., Habib, L., Jovanovic, T., Kamkwalala, M. A., Evces, M., Egan, G., ... & Ressler, K. J. (2012). Civilian PTSD symptoms and risk for involvement in the criminal justice system. The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 40(4), 522-529.
- Easteal , patricia . (1991) . Battered Women Who Kill : A Plea of Self- Defense . Women and the Law.37-47.
- Elbogen, E. B., Johnson, S. C., Newton, V. M., Straits-Troster, K., Vasterling, J. J., Wagner, H. R., & Beckham, J. C. (2012). Criminal justice involvement, trauma, and negative affect in Iraq and Afghanistan war era veterans. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 80(6), 1097–1102. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029967.
- Gerardi, R. J., Keane, T. M., Cahoon, B. J., & Klauminzer, G. W. (1994). An in vivo assessment of physiological arousal in posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103(4), 825–827. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843x.103.4.825.
- Gutimacher, M. S. (1954). The Psychiatrist as an Expert Witness. Chi. L. Rev., 22, 325.
- Hall KS, Beckham JC, Bosworth HB, Sloane R, Pieper CF, Morey MC.(2014). PTSD is negatively associated with physical performance and physical function in older overweight military veterans Journal of rehabilitation research and development;51 (2):285-96.
- HALIMI R , HALIMI H,(2015) Risk among Combat Veterans with Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: The Impact of Psychosocial Factors on the Escalation of Suicidal Risk.; 52: 263-266 .
- Johnson, P. E. (1985). The Turnabout in the Insanity Defense. Crime and Justice, 6, 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1086/449108.
- Karatzias, T., Power, K., Woolston, C., Apurva, P., Begley, A., Mirza, K., Conway, L., Quinn, C., Jowett, S., Howard, R., & Purdie, A. (2017). Multiple traumatic experiences, post‐traumatic stress disorder and offending behaviour in female prisoners. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 28(1), 72–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.2043.
- Kleim, B., Graham, B., Bryant, R. A., & Ehlers, A. (2013). Capturing intrusive re-experiencing in trauma survivors’ daily lives using ecological momentary assessment. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122(4), 998–1009. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034957.
- Krug, P. (2000). The emerging Mental Incapacity Defense in International Criminal Law: Some Initial questions of implementation. American Journal of International Law, 94(2), 317–335. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555295.
- Maxfield, M. G., & Widom, C. S. (1996). The cycle of violence: Revisited 6 years later. Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine, 150(4), 390-395.
- McFall, M., Fontana, A., Raskind, M., & Rosenheck, R. (1999). Analysis of violent behavior in Vietnam combat veteran psychiatric inpatients with posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Traumatic Stress: Official Publication of The International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, 12(3), 501-517.
- Meghan K. Hamwey, Lisa M. Gargano, Liza G. Friedman, Lydia F. Leon, Lysa J. Petrsoric and Robert M. Brackbill. (2020). Post-traumatic stress disorder among survivors of the September 11, 2001 world trade center attacks: a review of the literature. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(12), 4344:2-22.
- Miller, L. (2015). PTSD and Forensic Psychology. In SpringerBriefs in psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09081-8.
- Nash, W. P., & Litz, B. T. (2013). Moral injury: A mechanism for war-related psychological trauma in military family members. Clinical child and family psychology review, 16, 365-375.
- Ray, S. L., & Vanstone, M. (2009). The impact of PTSD on veterans’ family relationships: An interpretative phenomenological inquiry. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46(6), 838–847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.01.002.
- Santavirta T, Santavirta N, Gilman SE.(2018). Association of the World War II Finnish Evacuation of Children With Psychiatric Hospitalization in the Next Generation. JAMA psychiatry.;75(1):21-27.
- Sara A. Freedman, Gilad M, Ankri Y, Roziner I, and Arieh Y. Shalev.(2015). Social relationship satisfaction and PTSD: which is the chicken and which is the egg?. Journal of Psychotraumatology, 6(1), 28864
- Sherman, S., Fostick, L., & Zohar, J. (2013). COMPARISON OF CRIMINAL ACTIVITY BETWEEN ISRAELI VETERANS WITH AND WITHOUT PTSD. Depression and Anxiety, 31(2), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22161
- Sheynin, J., Shind, C., Radell, M., Ebanks-Williams, Y., Gilbertson, M. W., Beck, K. D., & Myers, C. E. (2017). Greater avoidance behavior in individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms. Stress, 20(3), 285–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253890.2017.1309523.
- Smith, J. R., Drouillard, K. J., & Foster, A. M. (2024). Exploring Care and Recovery for Individuals With Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: A Scoping Review. Cureus, 16(2) DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53741.
- Sparr, L. F. (1996). Mental defenses and posttraumatic stress disorder: Assessment of criminal intent. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9, 405-425.
- Svingen, Evelyn. (2023) "PTSD and crime propensity: Stress systems, brain structures, and the nature of the relationship." Heliyon,9(7).
- Taylor, E. N., Timko, C., Nash, A., Owens, M. D., Harris, A. H., & Finlay, A. K. (2020). Posttraumatic stress disorder and justice involvement among military veterans: A systematic review and meta‐Journal of Traumatic Stress, 33(5), 804-812. 10.1002/jts.22526.
- Weihofen, H. (1935). An Alternative to the Battle of Experts: Hospital Examination of Criminal Defendants before Trial. Law And Contemporary Problems, 2(4), 419. https://doi.org/10.2307/1189434.
- Yeo, S. (2008). Insanity defense in the criminal Laws of the Commonwealth of Nations. J. Legal Stud., 241-263.
- Zaverdinou, E., Katimertzi, M., Chrousos, G. P., Darviri, C., Vlachakis, D., Kanaka-Gantenbein, C., & Bacopoulou, F. (2022, October). Post-traumatic stress disorder as a risk factor for the development of risky behavior among adolescent offenders: a systematic review. In Worldwide Congress on “Genetics, Geriatrics and Neurodegenerative Diseases Research"(pp. 119-129). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31986-0_11.
Translated References into English
- Butcher, James; Minka, Susan; Holly, Jill, Psychopathology, translated by Yahya Seyed Mohammadi, Vol. 1, 7th edition, Tehran, Arasbaran Publishing, 2016. [In Persian]
- Jafari, Fereydoun; Saheb-Bayati, Soheil, “The Penal Legislator’s Criminal Thought Regarding Individuals with Mental Disorders with Emphasis on the Bill for the Protection of the Rights of Persons with Mental Disorders,” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Research, Vol. 11, No. 22, 2023. [In Persian]
- Habibzadeh, Mohammad Jafar; Mirmojidi, Sepideh, “Self-Defense in Light of Battered Women,” Scientific and Research Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence and Law, Year 2, No. 4, 2012. [In Persian]
- Darabi, Shahdad, Red Collar Crime, Tehran, Mizan Publishing, 2019. [In Persian]
- Rahmat, Mohammadreza; Ashouri, Mohammad; Mahdavi-Sabet, Mohammad Ali; Shiri Varnamkhasti, Abbas, “Differentiation of the Investigation Stage Concerning Mentally Ill Defendants,” Journal of Medical Law, Year 13, No. 50, 2019. [In Persian]
- Zamani, Sasan; Visani, Yousef; Mohammadian, Fathollah, “Study on the Prevalence of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Individuals with Experience of the Iran-Iraq War in Ilam Province in 2016: A Cross-Sectional Study,” Military Medicine Journal, Vol. 20, No. 4, Serial No. 76, 2018. [In Persian]
- Shokri, Reza, Islamic Penal Code in the Current Order, Vol. 1, 3rd edition, Tehran, Mohajer Publications, 2017. [In Persian]
- Alimardani, Armin; Rajian-Asli, Mehrdad; Mostafa, Vahedi; Mirhamad, Khani, “The Role of Mental Disorder Leading to Criminal Behavior in the Degrees of Criminal Responsibility,” Scientific Journal of the Medical System Organization of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2017. [In Persian]
- Farahi, Maryam, “Battered Woman Syndrome and Self-Defense: Legal and Empirical Dispute,” Legal Civilization, Vol. 7, No. 19, 2024. [In Persian]
- Kerring, Anne M.; Davidson, Gerald S.; Neal, John M.; Johnson, Sheryl L., Psychopathology, Vol. 1, translated by Hamid Shamsipour, introduction by Dr. Mahmoud Dezhkam, 4th edition, Tehran, Arjmand Publications, 2009. [In Persian]
- Kumar, Ronald, Abnormal Psychology, Vol. 1, translated by Dr. Fatemeh Dehghani Arani and Dr. Reza Rostami, 1st edition, Tehran, University of Tehran Press, 2021. [In Persian]
- Goldouzian, Iraj, Commentary on the Islamic Penal Code, 3rd edition, Tehran, Majd Publications, 2014. [In Persian]
- Mirsaeedi, Mansour; Gholami, Nabiollah, “Bipolar Personality Disorder from the Perspective of Limits of Criminal Responsibility,” Criminal Law Research, Year 6, No. 22, 2018. [In Persian]
- Nourbaha, Reza, Foundations of General Criminal Law, 34th edition, Tehran, Mizan Publications, 2017. [In Persian]
- Halgin, Richard P.; Whitborn, Susan Cross, Psychopathology: Clinical Perspectives on Mental Disorders, Vol. 1, translated by Yahya Seyed Mohammadi, 3rd edition, Tehran, Ravan Publishing, 2006. [In Persian]
- Yekrangi, Mohammad; Jahangiri, Nima; Jahangiri, Naeem, “Appropriate Criminal Response to Offenders with Depression,” Journal of Medical Law, Vol. 17, No. 58, 2023.
)