نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار گروه حقوق، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه شاهد، تهران، ایران.
2 دانشیار گروه حقوق کیفری و جرمشناسی، دانشکده حقوق، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
اگرچه خشونت خانگی بویژه همسرآزاری، یکی از مهمترین دغدغههای اجتماعی عصر حاضر به شمار میرود، در حقوق ایران، همسرآزاری مستقلاً جرمانگاری نشده و مصادیق آن، تحت عناوین مجرمانهی عمومی (ضربوجرح، توهین، تهدید و...) به فرایندهای کیفری راه مییابند. حال آنکه ضمانتاجراهای کیفری جرایم عمومی برای تأمین اصلیترین نیاز بزهدیدگان (توقف خشونت بدون تهدید خانواده به فروپاشی)، کافی و مؤثر به نظر نمیرسند. این پژوهش با رویکردی توصیفی ـ تحلیلی به منظور واکاوی امکان کابرد عدالت ترمیمی در پروندههای همسرآزاری و شناسایی مزیتها و چالشهای احتمالی آن، صورت گرفته و دادههای مورد نیاز، از رهگذر مطالعهی پروندههای همسرآزاری و انجام مصاحبههای عمیق با بزهدیدگان، قضات و کارشناسان گردآوری شده است. یافتههای پژوهش نشان دادند که عدالت ترمیمی بهمراتب بهتر از عدالت کیفری میتواند به نیازهای همسران آزاردیده پاسخ دهد و قانون مجازات اسلامی و قانون آیین دادرسی کیفری نیز از ظرفیتهای مناسبی برای کاربرد عدالت ترمیمی در پروندههای همسرآزاری برخوردارند. با این حال، فراهمنبودن بسترهای اجرایی مناسب، سبب شده تا در عمل، از ظرفیتهای قانونی موجود برای حلوفصل مسالمتآمیز پروندههای همسرآزاری بهرهی چندانی برده نشود و در معدود موارد ارجاعشده به فرایندهای ترمیمی نیز، به علت بیتوجهی به اصول بنیادین عدالت ترمیمی، حصول نتیجهی مطلوب در هالهای از ابهام قرار گیرد.
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
Evaluation of Restorative Justice in Domestic Violence in Iran
نویسندگان [English]
- Zahra Nemati 1
- Mohammad Farajiha 2
1 Assistant Professor in Criminal Law and Criminology, Department of Law, Faculty of Humanities, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Tarbiat Modares UnivAssociate Professor in Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of law, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]
A common form of domestic violence is intimate partner violence. According to statistics from the World Health Organization (WHO), in industrialized countries, about 24% of married women have experienced physical or sexual abuse by their husbands at least once. This rate increases to approximately 37% (about 1 in 3 women) in Middle Eastern countries such as Iran.
However, domestic violence is not explicitly criminalized under Iranian criminal law. As a result, such cases are typically prosecuted under general offences such as assault and battery, threats, insults, and slander. Yet, the penalties for these general offences often prove insufficient and ineffective in addressing domestic violence, due to the unique nature of spousal abuse—including the marital relationship between the perpetrator and the victim, the repetitive character of the violence, and the broader impact on third parties such as children.
On the one hand, requiring a wealthy husband to pay diya (compensation) to the victim in cases of physical assault, or a fine to the government in cases of insult or slander, neither alleviates the victim’s suffering nor deters the perpetrator from repeating the abuse. On the other hand, when the husband is insolvent, the victim receives no diya, and in other cases, the frequent judicial tendency to suspend sentences without mandating any corrective programs further undermines the deterrent effect of punishment. Additionally, the criminal justice system in Iran is offender-oriented and does not actively involve the victim in the justice process. Filing a criminal complaint against a husband may also threaten the survival of the marriage, which the wife may not wish to end through divorce.
Given the inefficiencies of the current criminal justice system—both in preventing reoffending and addressing victims’ needs—several critical questions arise: Is it possible to apply restorative justice within Iran’s criminal law framework? If so, what are the potential benefits of restorative justice in such cases? And what factors must be considered to ensure the effectiveness of restorative justice in addressing domestic violence?
This research employs a qualitative approach and a descriptive-analytical method to explore the applicability of restorative justice in domestic violence cases, identify its benefits, and examine the challenges that may arise in its implementation.
Methodolgy
To answer the above questions, in addition to using library resources, two other methods were employed for data collection: Content analysis of 25 criminal and family court cases related to domestic violence, and in-depth, semi-structured interviews conducted with a diverse group of stakeholders, including 45 victims, 20 judges, 15 attorneys, and 20 family health specialists (psychiatrists, psychologists, couples therapists, counselors, and social workers).
Findings
The research findings indicate that restorative justice can address the needs and expectations of domestic violence victims more effectively than the traditional criminal justice system. Moreover, there are existing legal provisions within Iran’s Penal Code and Criminal Procedure Code that provide a foundation for applying restorative justice. However, the lack of proper infrastructure and implementation mechanisms—such as insufficient and inappropriate spaces for restorative meetings and the absence of training programs for judges and attorneys—has significantly hindered the practical application of restorative justice in domestic violence cases. Even in the few cases where mediation has been attempted, failure to adhere to the core principles of restorative justice—including voluntary participation, confidentiality, and the neutrality of mediators and facilitators—has resulted in poor outcomes and undermined the legitimacy of the process.
Conclusion
To make restorative justice a viable and effective option in domestic violence cases, it is essential to establish appropriate institutional frameworks and to employ trained, experienced facilitators. In other words, successful implementation of restorative processes in cases of spousal abuse not only requires raising awareness of the benefits of restorative justice but also depends on the development of proper infrastructure and specialized training for facilitators and mediators who can competently manage these sensitive sessions. The central recommendation of this research is to promote the expansion of mediation institutions across cities, train mediators and specialized facilitators for handling domestic violence cases, and to outsource restorative justice functions—whenever possible—to independent mediation institutions rather than relying solely on entities embedded within the criminal justice system, such as public prosecutor’s offices and courts.
کلیدواژهها [English]
- Domestic Violence
- Restorative Justice
- Criminal Justice System
- Mediation
- Treatment and Counseling
- آذری، هاجر؛ بابازاده، زهرا (1398)، «حمایت از زنان بزهدیدهی خشونت جنسی خانگی در نظام عدالت کیفری ایران»، مطالعات حقوق کیفری و جرمشناسی، شمارهی 2، پاییز و زمستان.
- بابازاده، زهرا (1396)، خشونت جنسی خانگی در نظام حقوقی ایران، پایاننامهی کارشناسی ارشد، گروه مطالعات زنان، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس.
- ابراهیمی، شهرام (1395)، «خوانش ترمیمی از قرار ترک تعقیب»، در: دانشنامهی عدالت ترمیمی، زیر نظر: محمد فرجیها، تهران، نشر میزان.
- صادقزاده، مرضیه و صداقت، مستوره (1397)، «رابطهی اعتیاد با افسردگی، همسرآزاری و تیپهای شخصیتی معتادین»، پژوهشهای جامعهشناختی، سال دوازدهم، شمارهی 1 و 2، بهار و تابستان.
- فرجیها، محمد؛ ملاپروری، مهرناز (1397)، «موقعیت زنان بزهدیدهی خشونت خانگی در فرایندهای میانجیگری سنتی»، فصلنامهی تحقیقات حقوقی، شمارهی 82.
- ملاپروری، مهرناز (1395)، «رویکرد جنسیتمحور به قدرت چانهزنی طرفین دعوی در فرایند میانجیگری»، در: دانشنامهی عدالت ترمیمی، زیر نظر: محمد فرجیها، تهران، نشر میزان.
- ملکاحمدی، حکیمه و قاسمی، وحید (1392)، «ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺁﺳﯿﺐﺷﻨﺎﺳﯽ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻻﺕ ﻫﺮﺯﻩﻧﮕﺎﺭﯼ»، فصلنامهی اخلاق، شمارهی 33، پاییز.
- میرزایی، فرهاد و کریمی، نسیم (1398)، «بررسی راهکارهای عدالت ترمیمی در جرایم خانوادگی (مطالعهی موردی: ترک انفاق)»، مجلهی بینالمللی پژوهش ملل، شمارهی 40، فروردین.
- نجفی ابرندآبادی، علیحسین (1395)، «بسترهای اجتماعی و حقوقی عدالت ترمیمی در ایران»، در: دانشنامهی عدالت ترمیمی، زیر نظر: محمد فرجیها، تهران، نشر میزان.
- نویدنیا، منیژه و شاملو، ابراهیم (1397)، «بررسی عوامل اجتماعی مؤثر بر همسرآزاری با تأکید بر نقش نظام مردسالاری در خانواده»، زن در توسعه و سیاست، دورهی 16، شمارهی 1، بهار.
- یکرنگی، محمد و شیروی، مهسا (1390)، «عدالت ترمیمی؛ واکنشی مناسب در حمایت از آسیبهای روانی و جسمانی زنان بزهدیدهی خشونت خانگی»، مجلهی حقوق پزشکی، شمارهی 19، زمستان.
Translated References into English
- Azari, Hajar; Babazadeh, Zahra, "Protection for the Victims of Domestic Sexual Violence in Iran's Criminal Justice System", Criminal Law and Criminology Studies, 2/49 (2020). (In Persian) / https://doi.org/22059/jqclcs.2020.260328.1320
- Babazadeh, Zahra, Domestic Sexual Violence in the Legal System of Iran, MSc Thesis, Women Studies Group, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran (2019). (In Persian)
- Ebrahimi, Shahram, "A Restorative Reading of the Order to Abandonment of Prosecution", Encyclopedia of Restorative Justice, under the supervision of Mohammad Farajiha, Mizan Publication, (2016). (In Persian)
- Farajiha, Mohamad; Mollaparvari, Mehrnaz, "The Situation of Victim Women of Family Violence in the Traditional Mediation Processes", Legal Research Quarterly, 21/82 (2018). (In Persian) / https://doi.org/22034/jlr.2018.113058
- Malek Ahmadi Hakimeh; Ghasemi, Vahid, "Women and the Pathology of Using Pornography, Quarterly Scientific Journal of Applied Ethics Studies, 9/33 (2013). (In Persian)
- Mirzaei, Farhad; Karimi, Nasim, "Examining Restorative Justice Solutions in Family Crimes (Case Study: Not Paying Alimony to Wife), International Journal of Nations Research, 40 (2019). (In Persian)
- Mollaparvari, Mehrnaz, "A Gender-based Approach to the Bargaining Power of Litigants in the Mediation Process", Encyclopedia of Restorative Justice, under the supervision of Mohammad Farajiha, Mizan Publication, (2016). (In Persian)
- Nadjafi Abrandabadi, Ali Hossein, Social and Legal Contexts of Restorative Justice in Iran, Encyclopedia of Restorative Justice, under the supervision of Mohammad Farajiha, Mizan Publication, (2016). (In Persian)
- Navidnia, Manijeh; Shamloo, Ebrahim, "Social Factors Affecting Spouse Abuse in the Family with Emphasis on the Role of Patriarchy System of the Family", Women in Development & Politics, 16/1 (2018). (In Persian)
- Sadegh Zadeh, Marziyeh; Sedaghat, Mastoureh, "The Relationship between Addiction and Depression, Spousal Abuse, and Personality Types of Addicts", Sociological research, 12/1-2 (2018). (In Persian)
- Yekrangi, Mohammad; Shiravi, Mahsa, "Restorative Justice: an appropriate response in Support of Mental and Physical Injuries of Women Victims of Domestic Violence", Medical Law Journal, 5/19 (2011). (In Persian)
ب. انگلیسی
- Achilles, Mary; Zehr, Howard (2015), Restorative Justice for Crime Victims: The Promise and the Challenge, in Book: Restorative Community Justice: Repairing Harm and Transforming Communities, Edited by: Bazemore, Gordon; Schiff, Mara, Routledge.
- Basic Principles of Application of Restorative Justice Programmes in Criminal Matters, United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) Res, 2000/14.
- Bennett, Christopher (2007), Satisfying the Needs and Interests of Victims, in: Handbook of Restorative Justice, Edited by: Johnstone, Gerry; Van Ness, Daniel, Willan.
- Clemente, Miguel, et al (2019), Institutional Violence against Users of the Family Law Courts and the Legal Harassment Scale, Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00001
- Coker, Donna (1999), “Enhancing Autonomy for Battered Women: Lessons from Navajo Peacemaking”, UCLA Law Review, 47(1).
- Daly, Kathleen (2011), Conventional and Innovative Responses to Sexual Violence, Canberra: Australian Institute for the Study of Sexual Assault.
- Daly, Kathleen (2017), Sexual Violence and Victims’ Justice Interests, in: Restorative Responses to Sexual Violence: Legal, Social and Therapeutic Dimensions, Edited By Estelle Zinsstag & Marie Keenan, Routledge, London. https://doi.org/4324/9781315630595-7
- Decker, Michele, et al (2020), “Defining Justice: Restorative and Retributive Justice Goals Among Intimate Partner Violence Survivors”, Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520943728
- Des Rosiers, Nathalie (1998), “Legal Compensation for Sexual Violence: Therapeutic Consequences and Consequences for the Judicial System”, Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4(1-2). https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.4.1-2.433
- Dheerendra, Kumar Baisla (2016), “Secondary Victimization Under the Criminal Justice System”, Journal of Legal Studies and Research, 2(3).
- Dignan, James (2004), Understanding Victims and Restorative Justice, McGraw-Hill Education.
- Douglas, Heather; Stark, Tanja (2010), Stories from Survivors: Domestic Violence and Criminal Justice Interventions, T.C. Beirne School of Law, The University of Queensland.
- Elbers, Nieke; Becx, Iris (2020), “Secondary Victimization as Problem. Restorative Justice as Solution: A Research into the Scope of Secondary Victimization and Restorative Justice”, in A Criminal Law, Civil Law and Administrative Law, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
- Frederick, Loretta; Lizdas, Kristine (2010), The Role of Restorative Justice in the Battered Women’s Movement, in Book: Restorative justice and Violence against Women, Oxford.
- Gauwiler, Peggy; Mills, Linda (2004), “Moving Beyond the Criminal Justice Paradigm: A Radical Restorative Justice Approach to Intimate Abuse”, Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 31.
- Goel, Rashmi (2005), “Sita’s Trousseau: Restorative Justice, Domestic Violence, and South Asian Culture”, Violence Against Women, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801205274522
- Godden-Rasul, Nikki (2017), Repairing the Harms of Rape of Women Through Restorative Justice, in: Restorative Responses to Sexual Violence, Edited by: Zinsstag, Estelle and Keenan, Marie, Routledge. https://doi.org/4324/9781315630595-2
- Handbook on Restorative Justice Programmes (2020), Second Edition, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.
- Hopkins, Quince, et al (2004), “Applying Restorative Justice to Ongoing Intimate Violence: Problems and Possibilities”, Saint Louis University Public Law Review, 23.
- Iyengar, Radha (2009), “Does the Certainty of Arrest Reduce Domestic Violence? Evidence from Mandatory and Recommended Arrest Laws”, Journal of Public Economics, 93(1-2).
- Jeffries, Samantha, et al (2021), “Adult Restorative Justice and Gendered Violence: Practitioner and Service Provider Viewpoints from Queensland”, Australia Laws, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/laws10010013
- Lerman, Lisa (1984), “Mediation of Wife Abuse Cases: The Adverse Impact of Informal Dispute Resolution on Women”, Harvard Journal of Law and Gender, 7.
- Mercer, Vince, et al (2015), Doing Restorative Justice in Cases of Sexual Violence: A Practice Guide, Leuven Institute of Criminology.
- Miller, Holly Ventura (2008), Restorative Justice: From Theory to Practice, Emerald Group Publishing.
- Miller, Susan; Iovanni, LeeAnn (2013), “Using Restorative Justice for Gendered Violence: Success with a Postconviction Model”, Feminist Criminology, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085113490781
- Ptacek, James; FredErick, Loretta (2009), Restorative Justice and Intimate Partner Violence. Harrisburg, A Projection of the National Resource Center on Domestic Violence/Pennsylvania Coalition Against Domestic Violence.
- Sloan, Frank, et al (2013), “Deterring Domestic Violence: Do Criminal Sanctions Reduce Repeat Offenses?”, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 46(1). https://doi.org/2139/ssrn.2213310
- Stubbs, Julie (2002), Domestic Violence and Women's Safety: Feminist Challenges to Restorative Justice, in: Restorative Justice and Family Violence, Edited by: Heather Strang & John Braithwaite, Cambridge University Press.
- Van Ness, Daniel; Strong, Karen Heetderks (2015), Restoring Justice: An Introduction to Restorative Justice, Fifth Edition, Anderson Publishing.
- World Health Organization (2012), Understanding and Addressing Violence against Women, Intimate Partner Violence, Geneva.
- Zehr, Howard (2002), The Little Book of Restorative Justice, Good Books.