نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانش‌آموخته‌‌ی کارشناسی ارشد حقوق بین‌الملل، دانشکده‌‌ی حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران
2 استادیار حقوق بین‌الملل، گروه حقوق عمومی و بین‌الملل، دانشکده‌‌ی حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران
چکیده
ادلهی دیجیتال ناظر به اطلاعات برگرفته از «منابع بسته» مانند «یو‌اس‌بی» حاوی اطلاعات و «منابع باز» مانند پست‌های بارگذاری شده در شبکه‌های اجتماعی می‌باشند که بوسیله‌ی یک دستگاه دیجیتال تولید، ذخیره، دریافت، پردازش و منتقل می‌شوند. در دادرسی‌های بین‌المللی کیفری، این ادله ظرفیت‌های مهمی جهت فرآیند تحقیق و پیگرد جرایم بین‌المللی فراهم آورده اند و سابقه‌ی استفاده از آنها به دادگاه‌‌های بین‌المللی کیفری موقت می‌رسد. دیوان کیفری بین‌المللی نیز از این ادله استفاده می‌کند. مقاله‌‌ی پیش‌رو مبتنی بر یک شیوه‌ی توصیفی - تحلیلی، به این سؤال پاسخ می‌دهد که فرایند پذیرش این ادله در دیوان کیفری بین‌المللی به چه نحو می‌باشد؟ با توجه به ویژگی‌های خاص ادلهی دیجیتال، فرایند پذیرش آنها مطابق ماده‌ی 69 (4) اساسنامه‌ی رم و رویه‌‌ی قضایی، شامل مراحل ارتباط، ارزش اثباتی و اثر جانبدارانه می‌باشد. نخست دیوان باید احراز کند که ادله، علی‌الظاهر به واقعیت مورد بحث در پرونده مرتبط است. در مرحلهی ارزش اثباتی، بصورت علی‌الظاهر مبتنی بر مؤلفه‌های قابلیت اعتماد و گاه اهمیت ادله، قابلیت ادله در اثبات چیزی که مدعی آن هستند، بررسی می‌شود. در مرحلهی سوم، دیوان باید قانع شود که اثر جانبدارانه‌ی ادله نقض جدی حق بر دادرسی منصفانه را به دنبال ندارد. البته مواردی چون احتمال مشخص نبودن انگیزه و روش جمع‌آوری ادله، دشواری ارزیابی اصالت ادله به دلیل جعل، مشخص نبودن منبع اطلاعات یا زمان و مکان ثبت آنها و نیز امکان تقابل ادله با حق بر دادرسی منصفانه، مهمترین چالش‌های پذیرش این ادله در دیوان هستند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
Admissibility of Digital Evidence at the International Criminal Court
نویسندگان [English]
- ziba Nilaei Sangari 1
- Aghil Mohammadi 2
1 M.A. in International Law, School of Law and Political Science, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
2 Assistant Professor in International Law, Department of Public and International Law, School of Law and Political Science, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
چکیده [English]
Digital evidence refers to information obtained from both “closed” sources, such as USB flash drives, and “open” sources, like social media posts. This information is produced, stored, received, processed, and transmitted by digital devices. Over the past few decades, the rapid growth of information and communication technologies has enabled the generation, recording, and transmission of vast amounts of digital data. Due to its ability to capture precise timestamps and locations of events, as well as preserve information over long periods, digital evidence plays an unprecedented role in documenting international crimes. As technology advances, the International Criminal Court (ICC) encounters digital evidence more frequently than its predecessors, the temporary tribunals. However, there are significant challenges in admitting digital evidence, including uncertainties regarding the motives and methods of collection, difficulties in verifying authenticity due to risks of manipulation or forgery, the lack of clarity about the source, time, and location of the data, and the potential conflict with the right to a fair trial. This article, based on a descriptive-analytical approach, examines how the ICC navigates these evidentiary materials, the associated challenges, and the court’s approach to admitting digital evidence.
Methodology
This article employs a descriptive-analytical approach to examine the issue. Persian and English sources—such as books, articles, and ICC jurisprudence—were reviewed, with relevant material extracted and analyzed. Additionally, related documents, reports, and information from websites were examined to provide a comprehensive perspective on the subject.
Findings
Digital evidence is classified as documentary evidence at the International Criminal Court. Due to the unique characteristics of digital evidence, its admissibility process—based on Article 69(4) of the Rome Statute and the ICC’s jurisprudence—consists of three stages: relevance, probative value, and prejudicial effect. First, the Court determines whether the evidence is prima facie relevant to the facts at issue. At the probative value stage, the Court evaluates the reliability of the evidence, considering factors like integrity, metadata, source, chain of custody, and the method of collection. In the third stage, the Court assesses whether the prejudicial effect of the evidence outweighs its probative value, ensuring the right to a fair trial is upheld. These stages are not ranked in terms of importance, as each plays a distinct role in the admissibility analysis. The Court applies a relatively low threshold when determining relevance but assesses the significance of each piece of evidence later. In evaluating probative value, the Court focuses on factors such as reliability and the importance of the evidence for the case. The assessment of prejudicial effect is considered in light of the overall fairness of the proceedings. The Court typically excludes evidence only when its prejudicial effect significantly outweighs its probative value. The findings indicate that challenges in the admissibility of digital evidence at the ICC include uncertainties regarding the motives and methods of collection, difficulties in verifying authenticity due to manipulation risks, the obscurity of data sources, and the potential to undermine the right to a fair trial.
Novelty
This article fills the gap in scholarly attention to the legal framework governing the admissibility of digital evidence under the ICC’s provisions, rules, and jurisprudence. It provides a comprehensive analysis of that framework, emphasizing both technical and legal dimensions of digital evidence. The article identifies key challenges and proposes approaches to ensure a balanced use of digital evidence at the ICC while safeguarding procedural fairness.
Conclusion
The ICC’s current flexible approach to the admissibility of digital evidence is beneficial, but it is insufficient to ensure the full and effective utilization of such evidence. The ICC lacks a binding and comprehensive guideline specifically governing the assessment of digital evidence. Sole reliance on past judicial practice is inadequate to address the complexities involved in the examination and admissibility of digital evidence in future proceedings. To balance the admissibility of evidence with the right to a fair trial, the development of an official, detailed framework is essential—one that clearly articulates the technical and legal criteria applicable at each stage of the admissibility process. Additionally, the ICC should institutionalize the use of digital forensics experts and implement regular training for judges to enhance their capacity to evaluate digital evidence. From a fair trial perspective, the ICC must ensure that defendants and their legal representatives have sufficient time and resources to challenge digital evidence effectively. Engaging experts familiar with the technical aspects of digital evidence and improving judicial understanding are vital steps. The ICC must also ensure defendants have access to qualified experts for cross-examination, safeguarding defendants’ fundamental rights. Furthermore, the Court should strengthen cooperation with private entities, such as social media platforms, to preserve digital evidence, ensure access to metadata, and protect user rights.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- International Criminal Court
- Digital evidence
- Relevance
- Probative value
- Prejudicial effect
- Reliability
- Significance of evidence
- توحیدی، احمدرضا، افضل‌پور، فاطمه. (1399)، «تحلیلی بر نحوه‌‌ی ارائه‌‌ی ادله و استنادپذیری داده‌های سنجش از راه دور در محاکم بین‌المللی»، فصلنامهی تحقیقات حقوقی، شمارهی 90. https://doi.org/10.29252/lawresearch.23.90.263
- جلالی‌فراهانی، امیرحسین. (1386). «استنادپذیری ادلهی الکترونیکی در امور کیفری»، حقوق اسلامی، شمارهی 15.
- حیدری، مهدی. (1400). «حدود و ثغور ارزش اثباتی ادله الکترونیکی در حقوق کیفری»، همایش علمی مطالعات حقوقی، علوم قضایی و پژوهشهای اجتماعی.
- خداخواه، نسیم. (1397). «حقوق بزهدیده و متهم در دیوان کیفری بین‌المللی»، وکیل مدافع، دورهی 8، شمارهی 17.
- داودی بیرق، حسین (۱۳۸۷). ادله اثبات دعاوی حقوقی در فضای سایبر و مجازی، پایان‌نامه‌‌ی کارشناسی ارشد حقوق خصوصی، دانشکده‌‌ی حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه شیراز.
- روح‌بخش، فرزاد (۱۴۰۲). اسناد الکترونیک در دادرسی مدنی، پایان‌نامه‌‌ی کارشناسی ارشد حقوق خصوصی، دانشکده‌‌ی حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه شیراز.
- زاپالا، سالواتور. (1387). حقوق بشر در محاکمات کیفری بین‌المللی، ترجمه‌ی حسین آقائی جنت مکان، چ 1، اهواز، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز.
- السان، مصطفی، منوچهری، محمدرضا. (1397). «ارزیابی اصالت ادلهی الکترونیکی و ارزش اثباتی آنها»، مطالعات حقوقی، دورهی 2، شمارهی 10. https://doi.org/10.22099/jls.2018.28058.2765
- علیدوستی شهرکی، ناصر، کشاورز، علی و صادقی اصل، علیرضا. (1401)، «قاعده‌‌گزینی جهت پذیرش ادلهی الکترونیک در نظام حقوقی ایران و آمریکا»، مجله‌‌ی حقوقی دادگستری، دورهی 86، شمارهی 119. https://doi.org/10.22106/jlj.2021.530190.4171
- فضائلی، مصطفی. (1387). دادرسی عادلانه: محاکمات کیفری بین‌المللی، چ 1، تهران، مؤسسه‌‌ی مطالعات و پژوهشهای حقوقی شهردانش.
- فیضی چکاب، غلام نبی، «اعتبار حقوقی دلیل و امضای الکترونیکی (مرور اجمالی برخی منابع ملی و بین‌المللی)». (1389)، پژوهش حقوق و سیاست، سال دوازدهم، شمارهی 30.
- مؤذن‌زادگان، حسنعلی، سلیمان دهکردی، الهام و یوشی، مهشید. (1394)، «حفظ صحت و استنادپذیری ادلهی الکترونیک با استفاده از بیومتریک و رمزنگاری»، پژوهش حقوق کیفری، سال چهارم، شمارهی دوازدهم. https://doi.org/10.22054/jclr.2015.1782
- مؤذن‌زادگان، حسنعلی، شایگان، محمدرسول. (1388)، «استنادپذیری و تحصیل ادلهی الکترونیکی در حقوق کیفری ایران»، فصلنامهی دیدگاه‌های حقوقی، شمارهی 48.
- محمدی، سام، میری، حمید. (1388). «بررسی تطبیقی ارائه‌‌ی ادلهی الکترونیک در دادگاه؛ اشکال و اعتبار آن»، فصلنامهی علمی حقوق تطبیقی دانشگاه مفید، شمارهی 17.
- نجفی، سینا. (1398). «واکاوی معایب و مزایای سیستم رسیدگی و تعیین مجازات در دیوان کیفری بین‌المللی»، فصلنامهی بین‌المللی قانون‌یار، دورهی 11، شمارهی 3.
ب. انگلیسی
- “Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal, Nuremberg: International Military Tribunal”, vol. Xlll, Nuremberg, Germany, 1947.
- Aalto-Setälä, S. et al. (2021). Leiden Guidelines on the Use of Digitally Derived Evidence in International Criminal Courts and Tribunals.
- Arcos Tejerizo, M. (2023). “Digital evidence and fair trial rights at the International Criminal Court”. Leiden Journal of International Law, No. 36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156523000031
- Ashouri, A., Bowers, C., Warden, C. (2014). “An Overview of the Use of Digital Evidence in International Criminal Courts”, The 2013 Salzburg Workshop on Cyber Investigations, Vol.11. https://doi.org/10.14296/deeslr.v11i0.2130
- Avveduto, S., Conti, S., Luzi, L., Pisacane, L., (2018). The Conceptual Representation of the “Electronic Evidence” Domain; Handling and Exchanging Electronic Evidence Across Europe, Vol.39, Switzerland, Springer.
- Braga da Silva, R., (2021). “Updating the Authentication of Digital Evidence in the International Criminal Court”, International Criminal Law Review, 22, No.5-6. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-bja10083
- Freeman, L., (2019). “Prosecuting Atrocity Crimes with Open Source Evidence: Lessons from the International Criminal Court”, in: Digital Witness Using Open Source Information for Human Rights Investigation, Documentation, and Accountability, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Freeman, L., (2021). “Hacked and Leaked: Legal Issues Arising From the Use of Unlawfully Obtained Digital Evidence in International Criminal Cases”, UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs, Vol. 25, No.2.
- Freeman, L., Vazquez Llorente, R., (2021). “Finding the Signal in the Noise: Finding the Signal in the Noise: International Criminal Evidence and Procedure in the Digital Age”, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 19, Issue. 1. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqab023
- Gillet, M., Fan, W. (2023). “Expert Evidence and Digital Open Source Information: Bringing Online Evidence to the Courtroom”, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 21, Issue 4. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqad050
- Hellwig, K., (2022). “The Potential and the Challenges of Digital Evidence in International Criminal Proceedings”, International Criminal Law Review, Vol. 22, No. 5-6. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-bja10110
- Human Rights Center UC Berkeley (2014). Digital Fingerprints: Using Electronic Evidence to Advance Prosecutions at the International Criminal Court.
- ICC-01/04-01/06, PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I, 29 January 2007.
- ICC-01/04-01/07, TRIAL CHAMBER II, 17 December 2010.
- ICC-01/04-02/06-1838, TRIAL CHAMBER VI, 28 March 2017.
- ICC-01/04-02/06, TRIAL CHAMBER VI, 8 July 2019.
- ICC-01/05-01/08-2299-Red, TRIAL CHAMBER III, 08 October 2012.
- ICC-01/05-01/08, TRIAL CHAMBER III, 21 March 2016.
- ICC-01/05-01/08, TRIAL CHAMBER III, 27 June 2013.
- ICC-01/05-01/13, TRIAL CHAMBER VII, 9 October 2015.
- ICTR-98-44-T, Trial Chamber III, 25 January 2008.
- IT-05-88/2-T, Prosecutor v Tolimir (Judgement), Trial Chamber II, 12 December 2012.
- Janfalk, D., (2021). Fact-Finding Online – A Fair Trial Offline? An Analysis of the Admissibility of Digital Open-Source Evidence in Relation to Trial Fairness at the International Criminal Court, Master’s thesis, faculty of law, Lund University.
- Kayyali, D., Althaibani, R., Ng, Y. (2021). “Digital Video Evidence, When Collected, Verified, Stored, and Deployed Properly, Presents New Opportunities for Justice”, Last visited: July 23, 2024, at: https://iccforum.com/cyber-evidence
- Koenig, A., Irving, E., McDermott, Y., Murray, D., (2021). “New Technologies and the Investigation of International Crimes: An Introduction”, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 19, Issue 1. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqab040
- Lane, A. (2021). “Atrocities on Camera: Solutions to Admissibility Issues with Digital Evidence at the International Criminal Court”, Last visited: July 20, 2024, at: https://bytes.scl.org/untitled/
- Laving, L., (2014). The Reliability of Open Source Evidence In the International Criminal Court, Master Thesis, International Human Rights Law, Lund University.
- Mimran, T., Weinstein, L. (2023), “DIGITALIZE IT: DIGITAL EVIDENCE AT THE ICC”, Last visited: July 2, 2024, at: https://lieber.westpoint.edu/digitalize-it-digital-evidence-icc/
- Mossé Cyber Security Institute, “Digital Forensics: Hashing for Data Integrity”, 2022, last visited: 5 January 2025, available at: Digital Forensics: Hashing for Data Integrity — MCSI Library
- Niezen, R. (2023). “International Criminal Court is using digital evidence to investigate Putin – but how can it tell if a video or photo is real or fake?”, Last visited: July 20, 2024 at: https://theconversation.com
- Osco Escobedo Miguel, A., et al. (2023). “digital evidence as a means of proof in criminal proceedings”, russian law journal, Volume XI, Issue 5. https://dx.doi.org/10.52783/rlj.v11i5s.895
- OTP (2023). OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTOR POLICY ON CHILDREN.
- Prosecutor v. Zlatko Aleksovski, DECISION ON PROSECUTOR’S APPEAL ON ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE, ICTY, Appeals Chamber, 16 February 1999.
- Public International Law & Policy Group (2022). Chain of Custody In International Courts Training For Civil Society Documenters,
- Quilling, Ch. (2022). “The Future of Digital Evidence Authentication at the International Criminal Court, Journal of Public & International Affairs”, Online at: https://jpia.princeton.edu
- Ragni, Ch. (2023). Digital evidence in international criminal proceedings and human rights challenges, EU and comparative law issues and challenges series (ECLIC), Vol. 7. https://doi.org/10.25234/eclic/28255
- Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 17 July 1998.
- Roscini, M., (2016). “Digital Evidence as a Means of Proof before the International Court of Justice”, Journal of Conflict and Security Law, Vol. 21, Issue. 3. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krw016
- SCSL-03-01-T-745, PROSECUTOR v. Charles Ghankay TAYLOR, TRIAL CHAMBER II, 25 February 2009.
- Silva, Jason, WHAT IS METADATA AND WHY IS IT CRITICAL TO A FORENSIC INVESTIGATION?, 27 Sep 2016, Last visited: 5 Jul 2024, at: https://cornerstonediscovery.com
- Stavrou, K. (2021). “Open-Source Digital Evidence in International Criminal Cases: A Way Forward in Ensuring Accountability for Core Crimes?”, Last visited: August 3, 2024, at: https://opiniojuris.org/2021/01/26/
- STL-11-01/T/TC, Prosecutor v Ayyash et al (Decision on the Prosecution Motions for the Admission of the Call Sequence Tables Related to the Five Colour-Coded Mobile Telephone Groups and Networks), Trial Chamber, 31 October 2016.
- The Center for Research Libraries (2012). Human Rights Electronic Evidence Study.
- The International Bar Association (2016). Evidence Matters in ICC Trials”, 2016.
Translated References into English
- Alidousti Shahraki, Naser; Keshavarz, Ali; Sadeghi Asl, Alireza. “Rule-Making for the Acceptance of Electronic Evidence in the Legal Systems of Iran and the United States,” Justice Law Journal, vol. 86, no. 119, 2022, https://doi.org/10.22106/jlj.2021.530190.4171. [In Persia]
- Davoudi Bairagh, Hossein. Evidence in Civil Litigation in Cyber and Virtual Space, Master’s Thesis in Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Shiraz University, 2008. [In Persia]
- Elsan, Mostafa; Manouchehri, Mohammadreza. “Evaluation of the Authenticity and Evidentiary Value of Electronic Evidence,” Legal Studies, vol. 2, no. 10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.22099/jls.2018.28058.2765. [In Persia]
- Fazaeli, Mostafa. Fair Trial: International Criminal Proceedings, 1st ed., Tehran: Shahr-e-Danesh Institute for Legal Studies and Research, 2008. [In Persia]
- Feyzi Chakab, Gholam Nabi. “The Legal Validity of Evidence and Electronic Signatures (A Brief Review of Some National and International Sources),” Law and Politics Research, vol. 12, no. 30, 2010. [In Persia]
- Heidari, Mehdi. “The Limits and Scope of the Evidentiary Value of Electronic Evidence in Criminal Law,” Scientific Conference on Legal Studies, Judicial Sciences, and Social Research, 2021. [In Persia]
- Jalali-Farahani, Amirhossein. “The Admissibility of Electronic Evidence in Criminal Matters,” Islamic Law, no. 15, 2007. [In Persia]
- Khodakhah, Nasim. “The Rights of Victims and Defendants in the International Criminal Court,” Vakilmodafe, vol. 8, no. 17, 2018. In Persia]
- Moazenzadegan, Hossein-Ali; Shayegan, Mohammad Resoul. “The Admissibility and Collection of Electronic Evidence in Iranian Criminal Law,” Legal Perspectives Quarterly, no. 48, 2009. [In Persia]
- Moazenzadegan, Hossein-Ali; Soleiman Dehkordi, Elham; Youshi, Mahshid. “Ensuring Integrity and Admissibility of Electronic Evidence Using Biometrics and Encryption,” Criminal Law Research, vol. 4, no. 12, 2015, https://doi.org/10.22054/jclr.2015.1782. [In Persia]
- Mohammadi, Sam; Miri, Hamid. “A Comparative Study of the Presentation of Electronic Evidence in Courts: Forms and Validity,” Comparative Law Scientific Quarterly, Mofid University, no. 17, 2009. [In Persia]
- Najafi, Sina. “An Analysis of the Advantages and Disadvantages of the Trial and Sentencing System in the International Criminal Court,” International ghanoonyar Quarterly, vol. 11, no. 3, 2019. [In Persia]
- Rouhbakhsh, Farzad. Electronic Documents in Civil Procedure, Master’s Thesis in Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Shiraz University, 2023. [In Persia]
- Tohidi, Ahmadreza; Afsalpour, Fatemeh. “An Analysis of the Presentation and Admissibility of Remote Sensing Data in International Courts,” Legal Research Quarterly, no. 90, 2020, https://doi.org/10.29252/lawresearch.23.90.263. [In Persia]
- Zappalà, Salvatore. Human Rights in International Criminal Trials, trans. Hossein Aghaei Jannat Makan, 1st ed., Ahvaz: Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, 2008. [In Persia]
)