Mahmood Saber; mohammad jafar habibzadeh; AMIN AGHAEE
Abstract
People are actual victims of crimes against public interest, undoubted criminal protection of public interest is an instance of People protection. However victimization in crimes against public interest is one of the theoretical and practical controversial issues and damages caused victimization are ...
Read More
People are actual victims of crimes against public interest, undoubted criminal protection of public interest is an instance of People protection. However victimization in crimes against public interest is one of the theoretical and practical controversial issues and damages caused victimization are not easily recognized and compensated. Becuse on one hand these crimes effects are appeared after passing a long time (9-14) and generally they are without immediate victims and on the other hand its not possible to determine the valnerable people and harms caused by any of them can affect each citizen by dis pertion In the community. These obstacles not only make diffiicult prosecution for obtaining casual relationship and offensive faults but also make compensation difficult for victims both conseptually and procedurally. In addition to the difficulties related to the assertion Casual relationship complaining from valnerable citizens and potential victims also being non-objective and intangable of some damages has been become obstacle. In this article we are trying to study protective facilities, obstacles and traits in some legal systems in effective support of public interest and use these cases in condifiction of regulations in Iran`s law. .
Jafar Yazdian Jafari
Abstract
In this article I embark on the contrast between individual and national
security in crimes against security. Crimes against the state can be divided
into crimes against existence of state and authority of state. In these crimes
the first victim is the state itself. Crimes against the security are ...
Read More
In this article I embark on the contrast between individual and national
security in crimes against security. Crimes against the state can be divided
into crimes against existence of state and authority of state. In these crimes
the first victim is the state itself. Crimes against the security are located in
the first category. In these crimes accused rights probably are violated by
the state because the state cannot remain neutral. In this regard, firstly I
discuss on the principals of criminal law about crimes against security and
then its legality. Some scholars believe that public interest is a good pretext
to violate the given rights but other scholars firmly assert that no pretext is
welcomed. This research shows that the present criminal regulation of Iran
followed the first approach which has progressed after the revolution
(1979).
