Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Professor of Criminal Law & Criminology Faculty of Law Tarbiat Modares University

2 professor

3 stuadent

Abstract

People are actual victims of crimes against public interest, undoubted criminal protection of public interest is an instance of People protection. However victimization in crimes against public interest is one of the theoretical and practical controversial issues and damages caused victimization are not easily recognized and compensated. Becuse on one hand these crimes effects are appeared after passing a long time (9-14) and generally they are without immediate victims and on the other hand its not possible to determine the valnerable people and harms caused by any of them can affect each citizen by dis pertion In the community. These obstacles not only make diffiicult prosecution for obtaining casual relationship and offensive faults but also make compensation difficult for victims both conseptually and procedurally. In addition to the difficulties related to the assertion Casual relationship complaining from valnerable citizens and potential victims also being non-objective and intangable of some damages has been become obstacle.
In this article we are trying to study protective facilities, obstacles and traits in some legal systems in effective support of public interest and use these cases in condifiction of regulations in Iran`s law.
.

Keywords

  • انگلیسی و فرانسوی

    a. Books

    • Dinash Shelton & Alexander Kiss. (2005). Judicial handbook on Environmental Law, United Nations Environment Programme, 2005, Publishing Section of the United Nations Office at Nairobi.

    • Dirk van, Zyl Smit. (2007). handbook of basic principles and promosing practices on Alternative to imprisonment, Vienna, united nation office on drugs and crimes.

    • Divan , Sh. & Rosencranz, A. (2009). Enrinonmental law and policy in India, new delhi, Oxford university press. (new delhi Branch).

    • Epstein, Richard A. (1973). a theory of strict liability, chicago unbound, university of chicago law school.

    • Jose Cuesta Novoa and Miciades Ramirez Mclo v. (May 17 , 1995). the Secretary of public health of Bogota const. ct. Colombia: Minors Oposa. Sup. Ct. Philippines

    • Luc Lavrysen and Jan Theunis. The right to the protection of a healthy environment in the Belgian constitution: retrospect and international perspective – Constitutional rights to an ecologically balanced environment-V.V.O.R.-Report 2007/2-Report of the international conference organised by the Flemish Environmental Law Association, in collaboration with the European Environmental Law Association on 28 September 2007 -Isabelle Larmuseau editor.

    • Margaret B. Hinman & Alexander Hass. (2004). The Constitutional Doctorin Of Standing as Applied to Citizen Seeking to Right,Global wrong s, ADYOCATE, Agu, at 11.

    • Morrison  David E, and svennevig Michael. (March 2002). the public Interest, the media and privacy, A report for Britishbroadcasting Corporation.

    • Mqingwana, busisiwe. (2011). an analysis of locus standi in public interest litigation with specific reference to envirnmental law, University of Pretoria.

    • Peter, Cane. (2013). Principles of Administrative Law, 2nd Edition, Australia, Oxford University Press.

    • Singh, G. (1995). Environment law, New Dehli, Lawman Ltd.

    • Situ, Y. Emmons, d. (2000). Environment Crime, New Delhi,Sage publication,.

    • Stratieva, Nelly. (2011). locus standi for private applicants under article 230 EC, Maastricht University.

    • Thakur, k. (1999). Environment Protection law and policy in India, Allahabad.( India), manav law house.

    • Thomas W. Merril. Global Warning as a public Nuisance 30 COLUM.J.ENVTL.I.293,294,2005).

    • Wilde, M. (2013) Nuisance law and damages in lieu of an injunction: challenging the orthodoxy of the Shelfer criteria. In: Pitel, S. G. A., Neyers, J. W. and Chamberlain, E. (eds.) Tort law: challenging orthodoxy. Hart Publishing, Oxford.

      b. Articles

    • chau, kim, leong, Rebekah. (2005), “standing in public interest cases”, queensland public interest law clearing house Inc.

    • Longwill, Timothy. (2008). “standing in Environmental interests suits”, institute of technology law journal.

    • Murombo, Tumai. (2010). “strengthening locus standi in public interest envirnmental litigation”, Law envirnment and development journal, volume 6/2.

    • Steven,L. Witer. (1988). “The Metaphor of Standing and the problem of self-Governance”, 40, STAN,I. REV. 1371-1395.

    • D. Perben, ‘Ouverture des travaux’, Conférence des Présidents des Cours suprêmes des états francophones d’Afrique sur la contribution du droit au développement durable, Conference Proceedings of 3 and 4 February 2005, Court of Cassation, Paris, 2005

    • M. Prieur, (2003), “L’importance de la réforme constitutionnelle” Revue juridique de l’environnement.

    • Y. Jegouzo, (2003). “La genèse de la charte constitutionnelle de l’environnement”, Revue juridique de l’environnement.

    • Ph. Billet, (2003), “La constitutionnalisation du droit de l’homme à l’environnement: regard critique sur le projet de loi constitutionnelle relative à la charte de l’environnement”, Revue juridique de l’environnement.

    • R. Romi. (2003). “Les principes du droit de l’environnement dans la ‘charte constitutionnelle’: ‘jouer le jeuou mettre les principes ‘hors jeu’?”, Revue juridique de l’environnement.

      c. documents

    • Convention on the protection of the Environment through criminal Law. Council of, European Treaty series No 175 Strasbourg 4 NOV 1988.

    • Agenda 21, chapter B, Integrating Environment and Development in Decision Making, Para , 18.