EBRAHIM ZARE; Mohammad Ebrahim Shams Naterry; Mojtaba Ghasemi
Abstract
Alternative imprisonment have been evaluated from various aspects, but what makes all these kinds of writings valid is firstly their legal evaluation independently and in interacting with other institutions of Islamic Penal Code. Meanwhile if it is abandoned because of its inefficiency, it is not possible ...
Read More
Alternative imprisonment have been evaluated from various aspects, but what makes all these kinds of writings valid is firstly their legal evaluation independently and in interacting with other institutions of Islamic Penal Code. Meanwhile if it is abandoned because of its inefficiency, it is not possible to exploit the benefits of its implementation. This study is attempt to examine the general condition of multiple crime in alternative imprisonments (article 72, IPC), and interaction with other law institutes. the same way, it scrutinizes the effect of this confrontation on the determination of the penalties for alternatives imprisonment to clarify the effectiveness of this lenient institute and the limitations of applicable penalties. what springs to mind first regarding the multiplicity of crimes and the existence of this condition in alternative imprisonment, is intensification of this institution to deprive the perpetrators of a criminal offense of alternative imprisonment. On contrary, with the clarification of concept, the immediate effects of this condition will be determined by the fact that it will exacerbate minor offenses on one hand and discount for serious crimes and dangerous offenders on the other hand. Consequently, the existence of such a condition in the alternative imprisonment will rupture this institution.
Lamia Rostami Taberizi; Mohammad Kazem Zare
Volume 2, Issue 4 , November 2013, , Pages 137-165
Abstract
Public disclosure of conviction is accounted as a shaming sanction which pursues old promulgating sanction. Regarding to the fact that recognition of the philosophy of punishments and comparing the sanctions with them have a significant role in increasing the efficiency of the mentioned measures, public ...
Read More
Public disclosure of conviction is accounted as a shaming sanction which pursues old promulgating sanction. Regarding to the fact that recognition of the philosophy of punishments and comparing the sanctions with them have a significant role in increasing the efficiency of the mentioned measures, public disclosure of conviction has been analyzed from the criminal philosophy perspective. In general, the philosophy of criminal sanction can be divided into consequentialist and non-consequentialist philosophies. Consequentialist philosophy with the element of deep insight into the issue usually intends to acquire some utilities as a result of punishments while non-consequentialist philosophy usually wants to put the blame on the guilty. As the background of public disclosure of conviction is an old promulgating punishment, and has merely been modernized as a shaming method, this criminal sanction conforms with non-consequentialist philosophy more than consequentialist philosophy and would not rejoice in securing consequentialist philosophy. The above- mentioned fact can be regarded as an encouragement for the Iranian legislator to abandon or at least limit this sanction.
