Document Type : Research Paper
Author
Criminal Law & Criminology Department, Law & Political Science Faculty, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
Abstract
Punishments are changeable and depend on goals. Therefore, when there is valid knowledge that correctional goals of punishment are failed, releasing a criminal who certainly endangers public safety is a denial of public rights. In this case, presumption of innocence has been changed to presumption of guilt and the judge by realizing the objective and qualitative criteria that indicate the survival of dangerous situation, can determine the preventive detention.
Therefore, with qualitative approach and phenomenological methodology through library studies, this article seeks to address the following question: "What are the principles and criteria for legislation of preventive detention in the German, Iran and Imamiyeh jurisprudence legal system?"
The findings are that the main bases of preventive imprisonment are the discourse of overcoming public security over freedom, the discourse of victim-centered criminal law, the principle of caution and the rule of the need to repel harm, but the problem is the criteria for achieving a valid suspicion of a dangerous situation. It seems that valid suspicion can be obtained by determining quantitative and qualitative criteria.
Iranian legislature, relying on reasonable grounds and criteria, in cases of valid suspicion of a dangerous situation can legislate prevent imprisonment for dangerous criminals.
Keywords
- Esmaeili, M. (2018). Preventive justice: controlling crime through the legal system. Criminal law and Criminology Studies, 4(2), 297-326 [In Persian]
- Amini, Alireza; Pourmanochehri, Seyed Ali, (2017), "Tajari in the field of jurisprudence and its Principles", Journal of Islamic Law & Jurisprudence Researches, 5 (14), 51-66. [In Persian]
- Babaei, Mohammad Ali, (2011), Clinical Criminology, second edition, Tehran: Mizan. [In Persian]
- Bolek, Bernar, (2012), Criminology, translated by Ali Hossein Najafi Abrandabadi, 8th edition, Tehran: Majd Scientific and Cultural Assembly. [In Persian]
- Research Institute of Extraction and Judicial Procedure Studies. (2012). Collection of Judicial Opinions of Courts of Appeal of Tehran Province (Criminal), 2nd edition, Tehran: Publishing Department of Judicial Procedure of the country. [In Persian]
- Hajidehabadi, A. (2011). A Reflection upon Status of Imprisonment Punishment in the Legal System of Islam. Journal of Studies in Islamic Law & Jurisprudence, 2(4), 47-68. [In Persian]
- Haidari, Mohammad Taqi, (2011), Principles of Inference, translated by Mohsen Gharouyan and Ali Shirvani, second edition, Qom: Dar Al-Fikr Publications. [In Persian]
- Rizvani, Sudabah, (2016), a dangerous concept in the scope of criminal sciences, Tehran: Mizan Publishing. [In Persian]
- Rahbarpour, M. R. (2014). Juridical Principles of Prohibition and Criminalization in the Field of Bioethics. Islamic Law, 11(42), 119-140. [In Persian]
- Shiri A. (2018). The right of the victim in determining the punishment and the manner of its implementation. 23 (81), 77-105. [In Persian]
- Safari, Ali, (2016), Criminology, 30TH edition, Tehran: Jangal Publications & Javadane. [In Persian]
- Mir Khalili, S. M. (2010). Comparative Research on Tajarri (Temerity to Commit Crime) in Islamic Methodology of Feqh and Concept of Dangerousness in Criminology. Journal of Comparative Law, 0(19), 25-42. [In Persian]
- Nadjafi Abrandabadi, A. H., & Ayargar, H. (2015). Dangerous Offenders Supervision; Challenges and Solutions Journal of Criminal Law Research, 2(6), 9-37. [In Persian]
- Nadjafi Abrandabadi, A. H., & Rezvani, S. (2015). Preventive Detention with Emphasis on Article150 of the Islamic Penal Code of Iran 1392. Journal of Criminal Law Research, 4(12), 9-42. [In Persian]
- Nikbakht, Sara, (2014), Criminology, Tehran: Ava Publishing. [In Persian]
- Vaeli, Ahmad, (1378), Prison rules in Islam, 5th edition, Tehran: Farhang Islamic Publishing. [In Persian]
- Valai, Isa, (2018), Descriptive Dictionary of "Usul" Terms, 14th edition, Tehran: Nei publication. [In Persian]
ب) عربی
- ابن‌‌سعید، یحیی بن احمد، (1405 ق)، الجامع للشّرائع، قم: مؤسسه سید الشهداء.
- انصاری، مرتضی بن محمد امین، (1422 ق)، فرائد الاصول، ج ۳، قم: مجمع الفکر الاسلامی.
- جزایری، محمدجعفر، (1413ق)، منتهی الدرایة فی توضیح الکفایة، ج ۴، قم: مؤسسه دار الکتاب.
- جمعی از مؤلفین، (1490 ق)، الموسوعة الفقهیة، ج 16، کویت: وزارة الاوقاف و الشئون الاسلامیة.
- حرّ عاملی، محمد بن حسن، (1416 ق)، وسایل الشیعه، ج 28 و 29، چاپ سوم، قم: مؤسسه آل البیت (ع).
- خمینی، روح‌الله، (1395 ش)، تحریر الوسیلة، ج 2، قم: دارالعلم.
- خویی، سید ابوالقاسم، (1390 ش)، مبانی تکملة المنهاج، ج 1، تهران: انتشارات خرسندی.
- _______ (1388). البیان فی تفسیرالقرآن، قم: المکتبه العلمیه.
- سبحانی تبریزی، جعفر، (1387)، الموجز فی اصول الفقه، قم: مؤسسه الإمام الصادق.
- شمس‌الائمه سرخسی، محمدبن‌‌احمد، (1414 ق)، المبسوط، بیروت: دار المعرفه.
- صدوق، محمدبن علی بن بابویه، (1406 ق.)، من لایحضره الفقیه، ج 4، چاپ اول، بیروت: مؤسسۀ الاعلمی.
- طبری، محمد بن جریر، (1412)، تفسیر طبری، چاپ اول، ج 2، لبنان: دار المعرفة.
- طوسی، محمد بن حسن، (1371)، التبیان فی تفسیر القرآن، چاپ اول، ج 1 و 2، قم: داراحیاء التراث العربی.
- عراقی، ضیاء الدین، (1411)، منهاج الاصول، ج ۴، بیروت: دار البلاغه.
- فاضل لنکرانی، محمد، (1385)، ایضاح الکفایة، ج ۵، قم: دارالکتاب.
- فخر رازی، محمدبن عمر، (1379)، التفسیرالکبیر (مفاتیح الغیب)، ج 11، قم: دار الاحیاء التراث العربی.
- کاسانی، مسعود، (1986)، بدائع الصنائع فی ترتیب الشرائع، بیروت: دار الکتب العلمیه.
- منتظری، حسینعلی، (1411 ق)، دراسات فی ولایة الفقیه و فقه الدولة الاسلامیة، چاپ دوم، قم: دارالفکر.
پ) انگلیسی
- Alm, D. (2019). “Crime Victims and the Right to Punishment”,Criminal Law & Philosophy, No. 13.
- Clearwater, Darin (2017). “If the Cloak Doesn’t Fit, You Must Acquit’: Retributivist Models of Preventive Detention and the Problem of Coextensiveness”, Criminal Law and Philosophy, 11, Issue 1, pp. 49–70.
- Edwards, Ian. (2004). “An Ambiguous Participant: The Crime Victim and Criminal Justice Decision-Making”, British Journal of Criminology, 44, Issue 6.
- Harrison, K. (2012). Dangerousness, risk and the governance of serious sexual and violent offenders, Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
- Herz, Clara. (2017). “the Impact of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) on Preventive Police Detention as Governed by German Law”, Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences; 10 (6): 922-930
- Jessica Black MPhil, MA (Oxon.), BA. (2011). “Is the Preventive Detention of Dangerous Offenders Justifiable?", Journal of Applied Security Research, 6:3, pp. 317-338
- Keyzer, Patrick. (2013). Preventive Detention: Asking the Fundamental Questions, Cambridge, UK: Intersentia.
- Kitai-Sangero, Rinat. (2009). “The Limits of Preventive Detention”, McGeorge Law Review, Vol. 40, PP. 904-932.
- Merlo, Alida V.; Benekos, Preter G. (2017). Reaffirming Juvenile Justice: From Gault to Montgomery, New York and London: Taylor & Francis.
- Miller, Seumas. (2018). “The Moral Justification for the Preventive Detention of Terrorists”, Criminal Justice Ethics, 37, pp. 122-140
- Webber, Diane. (2016). Preventive Detention of Terror Suspects: A New Legal Framework, New York and London: Taylor & Francis
ت) آلمانی
- Basdekis-Jozsa, R., & Briken, P. (2012). “Die Meinung forensischer Psychiater zur Sicherungsverwahrung (SV) und zum Therapieunterbringungsgesetz (ThUG) :LLKJH?”, Psychiatrische Praxis, 6 (39).
- Baumann, I. (2006). Dem Verbrechen auf der Spur: Eine Geschichte der Kriminologie und Kriminalpolitik in Deutschland 1880 bis 1980, Germany, Goettingen: Wallstein Verlag.
- Bundesgesetzblatt (2010). “Gesetz zur Neuordnung des Rechts der Sicherungsverwahrung und zu begleitenden Regelungen”, Bundesgesetzblatt, 68.
- Kinzig, Jörg. (2010). Die Legalbewährung gefährlicher Rückfalltäter: Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Entwicklung des Rechts der Sicherungsverwahrung, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
ث) فرانسوی
- Giacopelli, M. (2008). “Punir et Soigner: Etat du Droit Positif en Matière de Récidive et de Réitération Commises par les Majeurs”, in Problèmes Actuels de Science Criminelle, No. 21.
- Herzog, E. (2008), ”La Nouvelle Rétention de Sûreté: Elements d'Analyse”, in Ajp, 4.
ج) گزارش
- Bergmann v. Germany, European Court of Human Rights. (2016). application no. 23279/14.
)