Alschuler, Albert W. (2008), “Studying the Exclusionary Rule: An Empirical Classic”, The University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 75, No. 4, pp. 1365-1384.
Ashworth, Andrew (1991), Principles of Criminal Law, 4th edition, Oxford University Press.
Ashouri, Mohammad. (2010), Criminal Procedure, Vol. 2, Tehran: Samt Publication. [in persian]
Babaei, Mohammadali. (2008), “Developments of the Criminal Justice System in the light of Islamic-Revolutionary Legislation”, the Judiciary Law Journal, Vol. 62&63, pp. 60-86. [in persian]
Bayat Komitaki, Mahnaz, Mahdi Balavi. (2015). “Reconsideration of the Interest of State Doctrine in the Light of Balance Theory”, Volume 17, Issue 47, pp. 123-155. [in persian]
Bazgir, yadollah. (2001). Substantive Opinions of the Supreme Court of the Justice in Civil and Criminal Matters, Tehran: Danesh Negar Publication. [in persian]
Burger, Warren E. (1964), “Who Will Watch the Watchman?”, American University Law Review, V. 14, No. 1.
Carlon, Andrew (2007), “Entrapment, Punishment, and the Sadistic State”, Virginia Law Review, Vol. 93, No. 4.
Choo, A. L. T. (1989), “Improperly Obtained Evidence; A reconsideration”, legal studies, Vol. 9, Issue 3.
Del Carmen, Rolando V. (2007), Criminal Procedure; Law and Practice, 7th edition, Thomson Wadsworth.
Dijk, P. van and G.J.H. Van hoof (1998), Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights, Kluwer law International.
Farkhshe, Ali. (2006). “Obtaining Evidence in Criminal Law”, Journal of Proceeding, No. 57, pp. 48-53. [in persian]
Ferdico, John N; Fradella, Henry F; Totten, Christopher D. (2009), Criminal Procedure for the Criminal Professional, 10th edition, Wadsworth cevgage learnig.
Firouzian Haji, Ebrahim. (2018). “The principle of innocence and citizenship rights and its roots”, Pazhouhesh dini Journal, Vol. 36, pp. 165-182. [in persian]
Ghorbani, Ali. (2005). Examining the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights in the field of the right to freedom and security and the right to a fair trial, Ph.D. thesis in Criminal Law, Tehran University. [in persian]
Gless, Sabine and Thomas Richter (2019), Do Exclusionary Rules Ensure a Fair Trial?: A Comparative Perspective on Evidentiary Rules, Springer Open.
Grander, Thomas J., Terry M. Anderson (2015), Criminal Evidence: Principles and Cases, 7th edition, Cengage Learning.
Grewell, Justin Bishop (2005), “A Walk in the Constitutional Orchard: Distinguishing Fruits of Fifth Amendment Right to Counsel from Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel in Fellers v. United States”, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol. 95, No. 3.
Hadi, Hajizadeh. (2014). Examining the concept of public interest, Research report, Iran Guardian Council Research Institute. [in persian]
Harris, David (1967), “The Right to a Fair Trial in Criminal Proceedings as a Human Right”, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 16, No. 2.
Haqparast, Shaban et. Al. (2018). “Validity Reasoning of Legal Rules in the Permissible Area”, Private Law Research, Volume 6, Issue 21, pp. 119-146. [in persian]
Heydon, J. D. (1973), “The Problems of Entrapment”, The Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 268-286
Katz, Michael (1966), “Supreme Court and the States: An Inquiry into Mapp v. Ohio in North Carolina - the Model, the Study, and the Implications”, North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 45, pp. 119-151
Khaleghi, Ali. (2018), Criminal Procedure, Tehtan: Shahr-e-Danesh Publication.` [in persian]
King, Michael (1981), The Framework of Criminal Justice, London: Croom Helm Ltd.
Oakst, Dallin H. (1970), “Studying the Exclusionary Rule in Search and Seizure”, The University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 665-757
McBride, Jeremy (2018), Human rights and criminal procedure; The case law of the European Court of Human Rights, 2nd edition, Council of Europe.
Pejman, Pourzand Moghadam. (2001). “Deep Construction of the Criminal Reason”, the Judiciary Law Journal, Vol. 34, pp. 9-33. [in persian]
Pejman, Pourzand Moghadam. (2000). Studying the theory of evidence in criminal proceedings, M. A. dissertation, Tehran University, Qom branch. [in persian]
Rasekh, Mohammad. (2014). Right and Expediency; Articles in philosophy of law, philosophy of right and philosophy of value, Tehran: Ney Publication. [in persian]
Saghian, Mohammad Mahdi. (2014). “The Reinforcement of Rights of Accused in the Primary Investigation Stage of Criminal Procedure Law (2014)”, Criminal Law Research, Volume 2, Issue 6 - Serial Number 6, pp. 113-136. [in persian]
Salehi, Mohammadkhalil, Ali afrasiabi. (2018). “position and powers of prosecutor in criminal proceeding system”, Volume 7, Issue 25, pp. 191-230. [in persian]
Sarmast Bonab, Bagher. (2008). The Principle of Acquittal in Criminal Law, Tehran: Dadgostar Publication. [in persian]
Shamlou, Bagher. (2004). The Principle of Acquittal in Modern Judicial Systems, Articles on Criminal science, Tehran: Samt Publication. [in persian]
Tabatabei Motamen, Manoucher. (2003). Public Freedoms and Human Rights, Tehran: Tehran University Press. [in persian]
Tadayyon, Abbas. (2016). Obtaining Evidence in Criminal Procedure (Comparative Study in Iranian and French Laws), Tehran: Mizan Publication. [in persian]
Tadayyon, Abbas. (2008). “The Theory of Exclusionary Rule in Criminal Proceedings (with an emphasis on French law)”, International Law Research, Vil. 2, Issue 3. [in persian]
Tadayyon, Abbas. (2009). “The scope of reason in the criminal proceedings of Iran and France”, the Judiciary Law Journal, Vol. 67, pp. 55-88. [in persian]
Turner, Jenia Iontcheva, Thomas Weigend (2019), “The Purposes and Functions of Exclusionary Rules: A Comparative Overview”, in:
Gless, Sabine and Thomas Richter (eds), Do Exclusionary Rules Ensure a Fair Trial?: A Comparative Perspective on Evidentiary Rules”, Springer Open, pp. 255-282.
Ziaei Bigdeli, Mohammareza. (2012). Public International Law, Tehran: Ganj-E-Danesh Publication. [in persian]
پ) پرونده
Arizona v. Evans, Supreme Court of the United States, 514 U.S. 1 (1995)
Boyd v. United States, U.S. Supreme Court, 116 U.S. 616 (1886)
Carroll v. United States, U.S. Supreme Court, 267 U.S. 132 (1925)
Mapp v. Ohio, Supreme Court of the United States, 367 U.S. 643 (1961)
United States v. Patane, Supreme Court of the United States, 542 U.S. 630, 2004.
Weeks v. United States, Supreme Court of United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914)
)