Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Law and Political Science Faculty Tehran University, Tehran, Iran

2 Doctoral Student in International Law, Tehran University (Farabi Pardis), Qom, Iran

Abstract

Abstract
Many codes advocating public morals have been challenged during recent years. The decriminalization of immoral acts, as one of the most important aspects of modern criminal law, has been rooted in the arguments of scholars such as John Stuart Mill and Joel Feinberg on the state intervention in individual liberties. These scholars by developing freedom restricting principles have advocated a kind of minimalist criminalization in the sphere of public morality. Moreover, the international human rights law system, in an effort to balance cultural diversity and universal values, has endorsed public morality as one of the permissible restrictions on unrestricted civil-political liberties. In fact, following developments in the performance of governments in the field of public morality, the international human rights system, by providing a progressive interpretation of the principles governing criminalization, reject the legal moralism has attempted to defend a kind of rights-oriented criminalization that protects the rights and freedoms of vulnerable people.
 

Keywords

  1. Ahmadi Tabatabaei, M., “Critical Recognition of Michael Sandel's Political Philosophy in the Relationship between Ethics and Politics”, Critical Research Journal of Humanities Texts and Programs, Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 17th year, Number 5, December 2017. [In Persian]

    Ali Akbarian, H., “the Place of Ethics in Legislation from the Perspective of Jurisprudence”, Quarterly Journal of Religion and Law, No. 9, Fall 2015. [In Persian]

    Allan, G.P. (2006). Moral Legislation and Democracy: The Devlin-Hart-Dworkin Debate, Department of Political Science.

    Almagor, R., (2001), Harm Principle, Offence Principle, and Hate Speech, Project of Freedom of Expression and Its Boundaries. See: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304690726_Harm_Principle_Offence_Principle_and_Hate_Speech.

    Clo. P. (2000). The Death of Public Morality? The American Journal of Jurisprudence, Volume 45, Issue 1.

    Dworkin, R. M, (1966). Lord Delvin and the Enforcement of Morals, Yale Law School, 1966.

    Dworkin, R., “The Right as a Winner”, translated by Mohammad Rasekh, Mofid Letter, spring 2002, Volume 8, Number 29. [In Persian]

    ECHR, A.D.T.v United Kingdom, App. No. 35765/97, 2000.

    ECHR, Door and Dublin well Woman Centre LTD. And Others. Ireland, Application Nos. 14234/88 and 14235/88.

    ECHR, Dudgeon v. United Kingdom, 1981.

    ECHR, E.S. v. Austria, Application n° 38450/12, 18/03/2019.

    ECHR, Feret v. Belgium, Application no. 573, 16/07.2009.

    ECHR, Handy side v. United Kingdom, Application no, 5493/72, (7 December 1976).

    ECHR, I.A.v Turkey, Application no.42571/98,2005.

    ECHR, Laskey, Jaggard and Brown v. United Kingdom, Ct, H.R.1997.

    ECHR, Stubbing v Germany, Application No. 43547/08), 12 April 2012.

    ECRI, General Policy Recommendation No 15 on Combating Hate Speech, Adopted on 8 December 2015.

    Elizabeth K. C, (Feb 2015), Restricting Rights? The Public Order and Public Morality Limitations on Free Speech and Religious Liberty in UN Human Rights institutions, The Review of Faith & International Affairs, Vol.13.

    Emil, S. (January 2014), Human Rights and Public Morals Exception in WTO, Doctoral Dissertation, PhD Candidate University of Hamburg.

    Feinberg, J. (1984). Harm to Others. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Feinberg, J. (1985). Offense to Others. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Feinberg, J. (1986). Harm to Self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Feinberg, J. (1988). Harmless Wrongdoing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Georg, R. P. The Concept of Public Morality, the American Journal of Jurisprudence, Volume 45, Issue 1.

    Greenawalt, k. Legal Enforcement of Morality, (winter 1995), Journal of Criminal of Law and Criminology, Volume 85, Issue 3.

    Ghomashi, S., “Foundations of Criminology in Modern Criminal Law”, Journal of Islamic Law, Year 7, Issue 24, spring 2010. [In Persian]

    Ghorbannia, N., “Principles, Realm and Areas of Validity of Ethical Legislation”, Quarterly Journal of Religion and Law, No. 8, summer 2015. [In Persian]

    Harington W. J. (1969). Morals and enforcement of values: an analysis of the Hart-Delvin, LLB, University of Sydney, a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of master of law, department of law.

    Hart, H., Freedom, Morality and Law (An Introduction to the Philosophy of Criminal and Public Law), Translated by Rasekh, Mohammad, (Tehran, Tarhe-no, 2010). [In Persian]

    Hart, Herbert, “The Legal Obligation of Ethics”, translated by Mohammad Rasekh, Ain Magazine, December and December 2009, No. 24 and 25. [In Persian]

    Heidarnejad, k.; Pour Qahramani, B, Beaigi, J., “Feasibility Study of Sin Criminalization (Disrupting Order, Security and Public Morality) from the Perspective of Theological and Legal Elites”, Intelligence and Criminal Research, Spring 2017, Year 14, Number, 1. [In Persian]

    HRC, 2012a. Irina Fedotova v. the Russian Federation, Communication No. 1932/2010. UN Document CCPR/C/ 106/D/1932/2010.

    HRC, Syracuse Principles on the Limitation and Derogation of Provisions in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Annex, UN Doc E/CN.4/1984/4 (1984).

    Human Rights Council, Seventy-second session Item 73 (b) of the provisional agenda, Promotion and protection of human rights: human rights questions, including alternative approaches for improving the effective enjoyment of human rights and  fundamental freedoms , Independent Expert on Protection against violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity , Note by the Secretary-General, A/72/172.

    Human Rights Council, Thirty-fifth session 6-23 June 2017 Agenda item 3 Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development Report of the Independent Expert on protection against violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity   Note by the Secretariat, A/HRC/35/36.

    Human Rights Council, Thirty-seventh session, 26 February to 23 March 2018, Agenda item 3, Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy, Note by the Secretariat, A/HRC/37/62.

    International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Human Rights Committee 102nd session Geneva, 11-29 July 2011, General comment No. 34, Article 19: Freedoms of opinion and expression, CCPR/C/GC/34

    Li, Z. (March 2016). The public conception of morality in John Rawls' political liberalism, Ethics & Global Politics.

    Mahmood Khan., A. (24 Feb 2015), Pakistan’s Anti-blasphemy Laws and the Illegitimate Use of the Law, Public Order, and Morality” Limitation on Constitutional Rights, The Review of Faith & International Affairs, Vol. 13.

    Mahmoudi Janaki, F., “Rightful Criminal; Emphasizing the German theory of legal interests”, Journal of Criminal Law Research, Winter 2014, No. 9. [In Persian]

    Mahmoudi Janaki, F., “Roustaei, Mehrangiz, Justification of Criminal Intervention; Principles and Necessities”, Journal of Criminal Law Research, Second Year, Third Issue, spring and Summer 2013. [In Persian]

    Mattress, S., (February 2002), the Protection of Morals under the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Human Rights Quarterly.

    Mill, J., On Liberty, Translated by Sheykholeslami, Javad, (Tehran, Elmi-Frahangi, 1979). [In Persian]

    Mill, J., Utilitarianism, Translated by Mardiha, Mortaza, (Tehran, Nashre-ney, 2010). [In Persian]

    Meyerson, D., (2007). Understanding Jurisprudence, Routledge, New York.

    Mozaffari, M., “Principles of Criminology in Sexual Crimes Subject to Hadd in Islamic Criminal Law”, Journal of Jurisprudence and Ijtihad, spring and summer 2014, No. 1. [In Persian]

    Peikherfeh, Sh., “the Challenges of Liberty in Mill and Feinberg's Explorations”, Journal of Philosophical Reflections, Year 7, Issue 19, Fall and Winter 2017. [In Persian]

    Perrone, P., Public Morals and the European Convention on Human Rights, 47 Isr. L. Rev. 361(2014(.

    Perry, M.J. (2005). A Right to Religious Freedom - The Universality of Human Rights, the Relativity of Culture, 10 Roger Williams U. L. Rev. 385.

    Poyman, L., “A Critique of Moral Relativity”, Translated by Mahmoud Fath Ali, Journal of Philosophy and Theology: Critique and Opinion, Winter and Spring 1988 and 1998, Number, 13 and 14. [In Persian]

    1. v. Bulter, (1992), Supreme Court Judgments, Canada, File No.: 22191.

    Radačić, I., (1991), the Margin of Appreciation, Consensus, Morality and the Rights of the Vulnerable Groups, Zb. Prav. fak. Rij.Vol. 31.

    Rahaei, S., Religious Freedom in International Law with Islamic Approach, (Qom, Mofid University, 2018). [In Persian]

    Rasekh, M., Right and Interest, Article’s in Philosophy of Law, Philosophy of Rights and Philosophy of Values, (Tehran, Tarhe-no, 2016). [In Persian]

    Robert P, G, (1993) Making Men Morals: Civil Liberties and Public Moralities, Oxford University Press.

    Ronga, A., (2014), J.S Mill’s View on Freedom of Expression and the Approach of the European Court of Human Rights, International Journal of Law and Legal Jurisprudence Studies, Volume: 3 Issue 4.

    Rasekh, Mohammad, Rafiei, Mohammad Reza, “The Ratio of Government to a Desirable Life; An Attitude Towards a Neutrality Approach”, Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence and Law, First Year, First Issue, Fall-Winter 2010. [In Persian]

    Rasekh, M., Mohammad Reza, “the Relationship between Government and Desirable Life: An Attitude toward the Life of Perfectionism”, Journal of Islamic Law, Year 8, Issue 30, fall 2011. [In Persian]

    Rostami, H., “Criminalization and Punishment in the Light of the Principles Restricting Freedom in Liberal Theory”, Journal of Criminal Law, Spring and Summer 2014, No. 9. [In Persian]

    Roustaei, M., “Comparative Comparison of the Principle of Harm and the Rule of no Harm in Justifying Criminal Intervention”, Comparative Law Research, Volume 19, Number 2, summer 2015. [In Persian]

    Qari Seyed Fatemi, S. M., Law in the Mirror of Ethics, Mofid Letter, Number. 29, Spring 2002. [In Persian]

    Sadeghi, M., Taghipour, Mehdi, “Fundamentals of Computer Pornography Criminology from the Perspective of Imami Jurisprudence”, Journal of Legal Discourse, Fall and Winter 2017, No. 32. [In Persian]

    Soroush, A., “Right and Modernization in Iran”, Ain Magazine, December 26, 2006. [In Persian]

    Stewart, H., (2010), The Limits of the Harm Principle, Springer Science Business Media B.V, Published online.

    Uddin, A., (24 Feb 2015). Public (Dis) order and Public (im) morality: an Introduction to the spring 2015 ISSUE, The Review of Faith & International Affairs.

    Voraraei, Akbar, Saadati, Reza, Hashemi, Hamid, “The Effect of Ethics in Criminalization and Decriminalization in the Islamic Criminal Law System of Iran”, Criminal Law Research, Year 3, Issue 8, Fall 2014. [In Persian]

    Wolf, C. (2000), Public Morality and the Modern Supreme Court, the American Journal of Jurisprudence, Volume 45, Issue 1.

    Wolfendon report, Report of the Committee on Homosexual Offences and Prostitution, 1957, cmd.

    Yeasmeen, N. (Sep. 2015). Interpretation of, Public Morals‟ under Article XX of the GATT, IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) Vol. 20, Issue 9, Ver. IV.

    Zafarghandi, N., News Report: “Caricature as an insult (printing insulting cartoons of the Prophet of Mercy)”, religions, mysticism, news of religions, Number. 18, April and May 2006. [In Persian]

    Zarneshan, Sh., Shojaei Nasrabadi, Mohammad, “Explaining Minimal Criminalization from a Moral Perspective”, Criminal Law and Criminology Studies, Fall and Winter 2017, No. 9. [In Persian]