Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD Student in Public International Law, Faculty of Law, Theology and Science Political, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of International Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

3 Assistant Professor of International Law, Faculty of Law, Theology and Political Science, Science Branch And Research, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Among the many areas in which the Martens’ Clause has been raised, great attention to international criminal law is of particular importance. Because in this context, the Martens' Clause and its elements, especially the principles of humanity and public conscience, as a rational solution that stems from the most sublime aspects of human dignity,has been manifested by an extensive interpretation in criminalizing the attack to human values, combating impunity and prosecution of perpetrators of international crimes.Additional attention to the Clause and the identification of its constituent elements, in international criminal law in theory and practice, it further reveals the high position of human beings in contemporary international law. International criminal tribunal have made effective inferences by using the capacities of the Clause and its effective role in the interpretation process, clarifying the content of the rules, blowing the spirit of innovation and the element of advancement into the international criminal law,filling gaps and eliminating the ambiguity in the international provisions, that make it possible to understand the content, and its legal functions.Therefore,the authors argue that a proper application of the Clause in international criminal jurisprudence will lead to the emergence of other principles and rules in international law.

Keywords

 
Aghayan Hosaini, Mohammad; Raei Dehaghi, Masoud (2016). “Semantics of conscience of humanity in international instruments”, Public Law Studies Quarterly, Vol.46, Issue.2, pp.441-463. [In Persian]
Agreement for the Prosecution and Punishment of the Major War Criminals of the European Axis, 1945.
Allied Control Council Law, No.10, 20 December 1945.
Annual Digest and Report of Cases of International Public Law, 1946.
Askin, K. (1997). War Crimes Against Women: Prosecution in International War Crimes Tribunals, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Atadjanov, Rustam. (2019). “Humanness as a Protected Legal Interest of Crimes Against Humanity: Conceptual and Normative Aspect”, Springer, International Criminal Justice Series, Vol. 22.
Bassiouni M.C. (1999). Crimes Against Humanity in International Criminal Law, Cambridge MA, Kluwer Law International.
Beigzadeh, Ebrahim; Tavar, Esmaeil (2018). “Contribution of the International Court of Justice on Clarifying the Concept of Humanity”, International Law Review, Vol.34, Issue.57, pp.7-29. [In Persian]
Cassese, A. (2005). International Law, Oxford University Pres.
Cassese, Antonio. (2000). “The Martens Clause: Half a Loaf or Simply Pie in the Sky?”, EJIL, Vol. 11, No. 1.
Cassese, Antonio. (2003). International Criminal Law, Oxford University Press.
Constitutional Court of Colombia Decision, Ruling No. C-225/95. (1995). in: M. Sassòli & A.A. Bouvier (eds), How Does Law Protect in War?, ICRC, 1999.
Convention (II) with Respect to the Laws and Customs of War on Land, The Hague, 1899.
Crawford, Emily. (2006). ‘‘The Modern Relevance of the Martens Clause’’, ISIL Yearbook of International Humanitarian and Refugee Law, Vol. 6.
De Guzman, M.M. (2000). ‘‘The Road from Rome: The Developing Law of Crimes Against Humanity’’, Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 22(2).
Falsafi, Hedayatullah (2000). International Law of Treaties, Tehran: Farhang Nashr Nu. [In Persian]
Faure, Michel, Goodwin, Morag, Weber, Franziska. (2012). ‘‘The Lex Certa Principle in Criminal Law: Reconciling Economics and Human Rights?’’ European Association of Law & Economics Annual Conference.
Ferencz, B. (1980). An International Criminal Court: A step toward world peace, Oceana Publications, London.
Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law, No. 10, 1948.
Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons (Advisory Opinion), ICJ Rep.,1996.
Lippman, M. (1997). “Crimes against humanity”, Boston College Third World Law Journal, Vol. 17.
Lippman, M. (2000). “Humanitarian Law: War on Women”, Michigan State University DCL Journal of International Law, Vol. 9.
Meron, Theodor. (1998). War Crimes Law Comes of Age: Essays, Oxford University Press.
Mettraux, G. (2008). Perspectives on the Nuremberg Trial, Oxford University Press.
Mundis, D. (2001). “The Legal Character and Status of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the ad hoc International Criminal Tribunals”, International Criminal Law Review, Vol.1.
Nelayeva G. (2008). Development of Treaties Concerning Punishment of Individuals for Unlawful Acts of War Committed by Individuals in International Law, Found at (http://www.idebate.org/
magazines/vol2issue3/058icc.pdf).
NMTs, United States v. Karl Brandt, Judgment, 20 August 1947, Medical Case.
Orentlicher, D.F. (1998). ‘‘The Law of Universal Conscience, Genocide and Crimes Against Humanity’’, Conference paper presented to the ‘Committee on Conscience Conference, USHMM.
Paust, J. (1995). “Threats to Accountability After Nuremberg: Crimes Against Humanity,’’ New York Law School Journal of Human Rights, Vol. 12.
Pictet, Jean, (1979). “The Fundamental Principles of the Red Cross: Commentary”, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 210.
Piri, Heidar; Seyed Mohammad Ghari Seyed Fatemi & Seyed Hadi Mahmoody (2018). “Discovery of Legal Rule through Analogy by the International Court of Justice”, Public Law Studies Quarterly, Vol.49, Issue.4, pp.1149-1170. [In Persian]
Roberts, A. (2004). “Righting Wrongs or Wronging Rights? The United States and Human Rights Post-September 11”, EJIL, Vol.15.
Salter, Michael; Eastwood, Maggi. (2011). ‘‘Post-war Developments of the Martens Clause: The Codification of “Crimes Against Humanity” Applicable to Acts of Genocide’’, Journal of International Humanitarian Legal Studies, Vol. 2.
Salter, Michael. (2012). “Reinterpreting Competing Interpretations of the Scope and Potential of the Martens Clause”, Journal of Conict & Security Law, Vol. 17, No. 3.
Sivakumaran, S. (2006). “Binding Armed Opposition Groups”, ICLQ, Vol. 55.
Tavar, Esmaeil; Beigzadeh, Ebrahim (2019). “Reflection of the concept of Humanity in international law: controversy between managerialism and humanization”, Comparative Law Review, Vol.10, Issue.1, pp.69-92. [In Persian]
Teson, Fernando R. (1997). Humanitarian International: An Inquiry into Law and Morality, New York, Transnational Publishers, Inc.
The Prosecutor v. Bosco Ntaganda, ICC Trial Chamber, ICC-01/04-02/06-1707, 4 January 2017.
The S.S. “Lotus”, PCIJ, Series A-No.10, 1927.
Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law, No.10, Vol.9, Part II.
United States v. Krupp et al., 1948, Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals.
United States v. Otto Ohlendorf, 9 April 1948, Case 9, Einsatzgruppen Case.
Veuthey, Michel. (2003). “Public Conscience in International Humanitarian Action”, Refugee Survey Quarterly, Vol. 22.
Zarneshan, Shahram (2018). “The Relationship of "Martens Clause" & Human Rights in the Contemporary International Legal System”, Public Law Studies Quarterly, Vol.48, Issue.2, pp.319-338. [In Persian]
cases
Prosecutor v Drazen Erdemović, ICTY, 1996, IT-96-22-T.
Prosecutor v. Furundžija Judgement, ICTY, No. IT-95-17/1-T (Dec. 10, 1998).
Prosecutor v. Krstic¨, ICTY (Trial Chamber), 2001.
Prosecutor v. Kupreškić et al., ICTY, Case No. IT-95-16-T, Judgment, 2000.
Prosecutor v. Milan Martic, ICTY-No IT-95-11-R61, 8 March 1996.
Report of the Secretary-General pursuant to paragraph 2 of Security Council
documents
Resolution.808, 1993, No.9, UN Doc S/25704.
Report on the Situation of Human Rights in Kuwait under Iraqi Occupation, UN Doc E/CN.4/1992/26.
Reported in Nederlandse Jurisprudentie, 1949, No.87, Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, 1949.
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2002.