mohammad ashoori; negin haghighat
Abstract
Acid attack, as an anti-social behaviour, is a serious crime with severe punishment under legal systems.The severe damage caused to the public order, and the harm caused to the victims necessitates severe punishment imposed on the the perpetrator and supportive measures provided for the victim.This paper ...
Read More
Acid attack, as an anti-social behaviour, is a serious crime with severe punishment under legal systems.The severe damage caused to the public order, and the harm caused to the victims necessitates severe punishment imposed on the the perpetrator and supportive measures provided for the victim.This paper examines the measures taken by the newly enacted law in attempt to prevent the commission of this heinous crime and to support victims.By adopting a descriptive and analytical method, this paper considers the legislative background of this crime, and examines its constituent elements under the new law.It examines the effect of aggravation of punishment, prohibition of applying leniency institutions, aggravation of abettor's punishment and adoption of preventive measures in reducing the occurrence of this crime. The paper emphasizes the need to provide physical and psychological support to the victims, which was not provided in previous legislation.The conclusion is that, in spite of the positive steps taken in the newly enacted law, in the sense of increasing the punishment, and providing supportive measures , further measures are still needed to ensure the prevention, and especially situational prevention of this crime such as identification of acid buyers and registration of such transactions
masood bassami
Abstract
Iran's criminal law in the material plurality crime is intended to aggravation of punishment the perpetrators but this is not so much in the immaterial plurality. the recognition of the immaterial plurality of the real is not easy. This difficulty is enhanced by the enactment of the Penal Code 1392 and ...
Read More
Iran's criminal law in the material plurality crime is intended to aggravation of punishment the perpetrators but this is not so much in the immaterial plurality. the recognition of the immaterial plurality of the real is not easy. This difficulty is enhanced by the enactment of the Penal Code 1392 and generates the rule of “plurality of result” because there is a similarity between this two juridical foundations. Therefore, it is imperative to carry out a study of the conditions for the realization of the immaterial plurality. The question of this research is what are the conditions for the realization of immaterial plurality and what is the point of differentiation and sharing with similar titles? The results of this study indicate that the conditions for the realization of the immaterial plurality are numerous; one of the most important of these is committing a unit behavior and violating more than one article of the Criminal law. Also, the most important aspect of differentiation of the immaterial plurality of the plurality of result is that, in the plurality of result from the unit behavior, various results are obtained, but in the immaterial plurality of the unit behavior, the unit result is obtained.
mohamad ebrahim shamsnateri; Farhad Sadeghi
Abstract
The intensification of punishment is always one of the most challenging issues of public criminal law. The multiplicity of titles (spiritual, credit) of crime is also no exception to this rule as a factor in the intensification of punishment. Iran's criminal law policy between a person who deals with ...
Read More
The intensification of punishment is always one of the most challenging issues of public criminal law. The multiplicity of titles (spiritual, credit) of crime is also no exception to this rule as a factor in the intensification of punishment. Iran's criminal law policy between a person who deals with a violation of several articles of criminal law with a person who has violated only one criminal code by acting. Article 131 of the Islamic Penal Code has been set up in the form of a multiplicity of offenses punishable by a crime, but has left many challenges. Nevertheless, the author in this research is one of the most important challenges in the field of multiplicity, including: ambiguity and doubt on how to recognize the punishment, the non-enforceability of the punishment and its consequences, how to impose extra punishments, and the boundary between multiplicity and multiplicity of outcome Has been investigated. In this paper, we have tried to provide answers to the questions of lawmaking and interpretation of the law to resolve these ambiguities.
