Document Type : Research Paper

Abstract

The growth of information technology, use of internet and social communications by computer- oriented process cause to increasing using of social networks. So, the use of these networks has become a part of life style. Joining to social networks and communicate with people thorough cyber communications can share the knowledge and professions. However, one of the most important effects of social networks is sexual victimization of women. Findings of this research shows that one of the most important types of women victimization is sexual victimization. So, this research analyses the is sexual victimization of women in Tango and evaluates the preventive measures. According to findings, general profile, not attention to privacy by users, finding users from several ways, not supervising in sending pictures and videos by Tango and loss of good mechanism to find offenders has increased the capacity of Tango in sexual victimization of women... . . . .

Keywords

انگلیسی؛
- Boyd, D.M. and Ellison, N. (2007). “Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship”, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communications, 13, pp. 210–230
- Broadhurst, R., and Jayawardena, K. (2011). “Online social networking and pae‌dophilia: An experimental research “sting”, In: K. Jaishankar (Ed.), Cyber criminology: Exploring Internet crimes and criminal behavior. FL: CRC Press.
- Chicago Magazine. (2011). "How CBBS and robot wisdom made the web as we know it". Retrieved September 6, 2013, from http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/The-312/February-2011/How-CBBS-and -Robot-Wisdom-Made-the-Web-as-We-Know-It/
- Halder, Debarati and Jaishankar, K. (2011). “Online Social Networking and Women Victims”, In: Jaishankar, K. (Ed), Cyber Criminology: Exploring Internet Crimes and Criminal Behavior, CRC Press.
- Koops, B., Leenes, R., Meints, M., van der Meulen, N., and Jaquet-Chiffelle, D. (2009). “A typology of identity-related crime: Conceptual, technical, and legal issues”. Information, Communication & Society, 12(1), pp.1–24.
- Marcum, Catherine and George E. Higgins (2014), Social Networking as a Criminal Enterprise, CRC press.
- Neondorf, Kimberly A. (2002). the content analysis guidebook, London, sage pub.
- Sargent, james D etall. (2001): Marketing cigrettes in cinema fils, vol 357, No. 9249.
- Papacharissi, Z. (2009). “The virtual geographies of social networks: A comparative analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn and a SmallWorld”. New Media Society, 11, 199. Retrieved June 15, 2013, from http://tigger.uic.edu/~zizi/Site/Research_files/VirtualGeographiesFacebook.pdf
- Sweney, M. (2012, August 3). “Facebook quarterly report reveals 83m profiles are fake”. The Guardian. Retrieved on June 15, 2013, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2012/aug/02/facebook-83m-profiles-bogus-fake
- Wesch, M. (2009). “YouTube and you: Experiences of self-awareness in the context collapse of the recording webcam”. Explorations in Media Ecology, 8(2), pp. 19–34.
- Wilson, R. E., Gosling, S. D. and Graham, L. T. (2012). “A review of Facebook research in the social sciences”. Perspectives on Psychological Sciences, 7(3), pp. 203–220.