Jafar Yazdian Jafari
Abstract
In this article I embark on the contrast between individual and national
security in crimes against security. Crimes against the state can be divided
into crimes against existence of state and authority of state. In these crimes
the first victim is the state itself. Crimes against the security are ...
Read More
In this article I embark on the contrast between individual and national
security in crimes against security. Crimes against the state can be divided
into crimes against existence of state and authority of state. In these crimes
the first victim is the state itself. Crimes against the security are located in
the first category. In these crimes accused rights probably are violated by
the state because the state cannot remain neutral. In this regard, firstly I
discuss on the principals of criminal law about crimes against security and
then its legality. Some scholars believe that public interest is a good pretext
to violate the given rights but other scholars firmly assert that no pretext is
welcomed. This research shows that the present criminal regulation of Iran
followed the first approach which has progressed after the revolution
(1979).
Abdoulali Tavajohi; Ali Dehghani
Volume 1, Issue 3 , July 2013, , Pages 7-34
Abstract
Providing security has been the first aim of the governments— eitherauthoritarian or democratic. Nevertheless, security is such an interpretableword that it sometimes results in different kinds of misinterpretations.Securing this vital element in society needs to be dealt with as a whole andkeep ...
Read More
Providing security has been the first aim of the governments— eitherauthoritarian or democratic. Nevertheless, security is such an interpretableword that it sometimes results in different kinds of misinterpretations.Securing this vital element in society needs to be dealt with as a whole andkeep the government approach away. In the absence of this view, themeaning of security will be assumed as a state security and every action suchas ignoring the fair trial and criminal procedure rules would be justified. Inthis essay, the encounter of the "security-approach" and the well-knownrules of criminal procedure and fair trial will be studied in the light of overviewing one verdict of administrative justice tribunal.
Behzad Rzavifard; Marzyeh Dirbaz
Volume 1, Issue 3 , July 2013, , Pages 99-117
Abstract
The International Criminal Court (ICC), having the jurisdiction over themost serious crimes of concern to the international community, is establishedto end the impunity for the perpetrators of these crimes. ICC provisions havetaken different supports for victims into account. The Rome Statute, the rulesof ...
Read More
The International Criminal Court (ICC), having the jurisdiction over themost serious crimes of concern to the international community, is establishedto end the impunity for the perpetrators of these crimes. ICC provisions havetaken different supports for victims into account. The Rome Statute, the rulesof procedure and evidence, the regulations of the court, the staff regulations&the agreement on the privileges and the immunities of the internationalcriminal court are the documents that make clear the rights of victims in thejustice process. Rights such as participation in proceedings, benefit fromlegal representatives’ assistance, notification of criminal justice system, andsecurity are considered as legal protections. Victims’ rights, in ICCproceedings, will be explained& examined– in the light of ICC provisionsand with regard to available judicial procedure- in this study.
