mohammad haddadzadeh; mohammad hhabibzadeh; mohammad faragiha
Abstract
Abstract The logic of benefic cost which forms the base of some ideas named as the economic theories to explain the offences, although it was stated by Gary Becker the economist, so its roots can be seen in idea of Beccaria and Bentham in the 18th century.. This logic beside its strength points has become ...
Read More
Abstract The logic of benefic cost which forms the base of some ideas named as the economic theories to explain the offences, although it was stated by Gary Becker the economist, so its roots can be seen in idea of Beccaria and Bentham in the 18th century.. This logic beside its strength points has become a serious support to protect the execution resorting to its preventive function. Analyzing the drug offenders’ decision procedure is necessary to evaluate this claim and to emphasize or reject the deterrence of execution. Indeed , in drug offences in Iran, confidence in some conditions such as logic calculations and standard percentage of committed offences , the offenders’ knowledge about the benefits and risks of the crime, possibility of voluntary decision making and selection of the type and weight of the materials. While, analysis the present situation and referring to the judges’ evidences and experiences indicate that for some reasons such as the chained structure of smuggle in the country and conditions of the south-eastern regions and the characteristics of the accused, this confidence is not present
hamidreza daneshnari; Elnaz Nesai Javan
Abstract
Today, in the light of new attitudes in cultural crime, the discussion of the media representation of the status of women has been considered. The cinema as the seventh art has always been associated with gender-based approaches, and the representation of gender and women has been reflected. Accordingly, ...
Read More
Today, in the light of new attitudes in cultural crime, the discussion of the media representation of the status of women has been considered. The cinema as the seventh art has always been associated with gender-based approaches, and the representation of gender and women has been reflected. Accordingly, this study, using the qualitative content analysis method, aims to analyze and evaluate the cinematic film in the light of gender-based approaches. Based on the findings of the content analysis, Monsanto's film, focusing on the crime of rape and drawing the problems of the victims of this territory, seeks to recognize the rights of women and support victims of rape. The focus on translating the obvious and hidden meanings of the film shows that the hegemony of patriarchal thinking in the epistemology of rape is confirmed in the form of a victimized blaming theory of the role of a victim of crime, and sometimes in the light of the dualism of the noble-minded women, the victim's delinquency. However, the overall assessment shows that the film recognizes extremist feminist attitudes such as existentialist and psychoanalytic feminism.
alihasan babaei; ahmad reza tohidi; Mahmoud Ghayumzade Kharangi
Abstract
Sometimes the prosecutor suspends filing or filing a case, subject to circumstances rather than prosecution, despite the occurrence of a crime. The prosecution authority in the national systems is the duty of the prosecutor. The question is, is the legal system of the International Criminal Court (ICC) ...
Read More
Sometimes the prosecutor suspends filing or filing a case, subject to circumstances rather than prosecution, despite the occurrence of a crime. The prosecution authority in the national systems is the duty of the prosecutor. The question is, is the legal system of the International Criminal Court (ICC) approach to the principle of prosecution. Investigating the authority of the prosecutor in national systems and the International Criminal Court, from a comparative viewpoint, analytically-descriptive and using library resources, shows that the legal system of the Court has a systematic and well-defined approach to pursuing the necessary. Contrary to national prosecution systems, it is not the prosecutor's permission alone, but the joint task of the prosecutor and the preliminary branch. Although the prosecutor is independent in his performance, his decisions are under the supervision of the branch office. The selection and prioritization criteria for pursuing the most important crimes and the monitoring mechanism are in line with the principle of prosecution and the promise of a fair trial in the Court, and can be a suitable model for the uniformization of investigation and prosecution practices in national systems, including the Iranian criminal system Which has not been shown to be a valid requirement.
Ali Mohamadian; leyla mehrabi; mansoure bokaee
Abstract
Imsaak in Imamiya jurisprudence means to keep and capture the victim; So that” the keeping person:Momsek” prevents the victim from leaving the dominant hegemony and the killer can easily kill him. Imamis' jurisprudents agree that the punishment of "Momsek" is life imprisonment; but there ...
Read More
Imsaak in Imamiya jurisprudence means to keep and capture the victim; So that” the keeping person:Momsek” prevents the victim from leaving the dominant hegemony and the killer can easily kill him. Imamis' jurisprudents agree that the punishment of "Momsek" is life imprisonment; but there is a serious controversy among the jurisprudents About what the nature of this punishment is and should it be analyzed in the light of the Haqa alnaas and as a result, it is forgiven and amnesty or it is Haqa allah and so there is no way for reconciliation. Because this difference in opinion also affects criminal law and can have different effects, the present paper, in a descriptive-analytic study, and in the light of referring to legal and juridical sources, seeks to analyze the meaning of the punishment of "Momsek". The results of the research show that it is possible to consider the crime of Imsaak as a Ta'zir ; or at the very least, consider it as a Haqa alnass and compromise and amnesty.
danial mabhot; Mostafa Masoudian
Abstract
The positions of the Prophet and the infallible Imams can be divided into three dignities, divine orders prophecy, judgment, and supervisor. Paying attention to the position and dignity of the innocent in issuing a narrative contributes greatly to the correct understanding of the narrations.The question ...
Read More
The positions of the Prophet and the infallible Imams can be divided into three dignities, divine orders prophecy, judgment, and supervisor. Paying attention to the position and dignity of the innocent in issuing a narrative contributes greatly to the correct understanding of the narrations.The question here is whether the observer narrations of the Diya guilds have been validated by the divine orders prophecy to the Prophet and the infallible Imams and as a result, in the present day, the killer have authority to pay every one of those guilds or basically determining the Diya guilds is governmental; therefore the Islamic ruler with regards the appropriates of society can order to pay a certain guild of these guilds? In this descriptive-analytical article, the nature of the order for the sixth guild of Diya is regarded as a government; therefore, for the payment of Diya, killer must only pay the Diya from the guilds designated by the ruler. On this basis, the Article 549 of the Islamic Penal Code, because of reduction of determining of blood money type to juridical practices it has been considered to be criticized and a replacement of Article 421-1 of the Islamic Penal Code has been proposed.
Mohsen Rezaee; Mohamad Mirzaee
Abstract
استناد به مصلحت در سیاستگذاری جنایی همواره از موضوعات چالشی میان فقها و حقوقدانان تلقی شده است. علیرغم تمام ایراداتی که توسط مخالفان حجیت و کاربرد مصلحت در امور فقهی ...
Read More
استناد به مصلحت در سیاستگذاری جنایی همواره از موضوعات چالشی میان فقها و حقوقدانان تلقی شده است. علیرغم تمام ایراداتی که توسط مخالفان حجیت و کاربرد مصلحت در امور فقهی و حقوقی اقامه گردیده ولیکن ضرورت استناد به آن البته در پرتو ضوابط شرعی و عقلی در لزوم رعایت مصالح و مقتضیات زمان و مکان و در صدور احکام و تدوین قوانین ضمن از بین بردن محجوریت اسلام و کاهش شبهه تحجّر و تصلّب دینی در عدم تامین نیازهای ضروری انسان، باعث فتح بابی ضابطهمند در تجدیدنظر در موضوعات مستحدثه خواهد شد. بنابراین ضرورت دارد تا با توجه به حساسیتهای موجود درباره کاربرد مصلحت در امور کیفری که مستقیما با حقوق بنیادین افراد رابطه دارد، ضوابط استناد به آن در مصلحتانگاری در ابعاد مختلف سیاست جنایی تبیین گردد. یافتههای این مقاله که با روش توصیفی و تحلیلی تهیه شده بیان میدارد که قلمرو کاربرد مصلحت را نبایستی صرفا منحصر به نوع خاصی از احکام مانند تعزیرات دانست بلکه به دلیل تبعیت تمام احکام از مصالح و مفاسد نفسالامری، در تمام احکام جاری و ساری خواهد بود ولیکن این جریان منطبق با قواعد و ضوابط کلی عقلی و شرعی و تحت ضوابطی خواهد بود که در این مقاله احصا گردیده است.
Abstract
In accordance with the prevailing understanding of the principles of Article 168 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the absolute political (both press and non-press) crimes and the press (both political and non-political) shall fall under the said principle and all such offenses shall ...
Read More
In accordance with the prevailing understanding of the principles of Article 168 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the absolute political (both press and non-press) crimes and the press (both political and non-political) shall fall under the said principle and all such offenses shall be dealt with. This conception of Article 168 has shaped the practice of the current system of judicial system in Iran over the past three decades for the prosecution of press crimes courts, whereby the rights and dignity of individuals or the ethical standards and order of public safety during proceedings. Many publications of the press and media have been publicly infringed. Iran's economy has been critically reviewed and cited in the absolute openness of press crime hearing that finally must have been held in secret, with the exceptions to the principle of publicity - the ill-conceived consequences of the public formation of the press court, and in order to get out of this defective judicial tradition, the enforcement of the two laws of criminal procedure enacted in March 2013 and the political crime enacted in 1395 (That would disable political and civil courts T allowed), has been emphasized.
