Code of Criminal Procedure
Anahita Seifi; jabrail nozohour
Abstract
Economic crimes are one of the major challenges of societies at the national and international levels and have devastating effects on the economic order and security of countries. The security of some economic crimes based on jurisprudential views and hostile discourse towards macroeconomic criminals ...
Read More
Economic crimes are one of the major challenges of societies at the national and international levels and have devastating effects on the economic order and security of countries. The security of some economic crimes based on jurisprudential views and hostile discourse towards macroeconomic criminals and the globalization of some new forms of these crimes have led to the use of security-oriented strategies in the process of prosecuting economic crimes in Iran. This study intends to analyze the effects of security-oriented approaches and the challenges they face in teaching economic crimes in the Iranian legal system through descriptive and analytical methods. The findings of this study show that the country's judicial system does not have the necessary coherence in this regard. Applying a security-oriented approach in responding to the perpetrators of these crimes has led to its confrontation with the global model of fair trial and deviation from its standards and has limited the right of defendants to defend themselves. Extreme securityism is corrupt in the long run, regardless of human rights standards. It requires the existence of a coherent and differential criminal policy, especially in the procedure of these crimes in the organization and the trial, and attention to professionalism in all its dimensions.Economic crimes are one of the major challenges of societies at the national and international levels and have devastating effects on the economic order and security of countries. The security of some economic crimes based on jurisprudential views and hostile discourse towards macroeconomic criminals and the globalization of some new forms of these crimes have led to the use of security-oriented strategies in the process of prosecuting economic crimes in Iran. This study intends to analyze the effects of security-oriented approaches and the challenges they face in teaching economic crimes in the Iranian legal system through descriptive and analytical methods. The findings of this study show that the country's judicial system does not have the necessary coherence in this regard. Applying a security-oriented approach in responding to the perpetrators of these crimes has led to its confrontation with the global model of fair trial and deviation from its standards and has limited the right of defendants to defend themselves. Extreme securityism is corrupt in the long run, regardless of human rights standards. It requires the existence of a coherent and differential criminal policy, especially in the procedure of these crimes in the organization and the trial, and attention to professionalism in all its dimensions.Economic crimes are one of the major challenges of societies at the national and international levels and have devastating effects on the economic order and security of countries. The security of some economic crimes based on jurisprudential views and hostile discourse towards macroeconomic criminals and the globalization of some new forms of these crimes have led to the use of security-oriented strategies in the process of prosecuting economic crimes in Iran. This study intends to analyze the effects of security-oriented approaches and the challenges they face in teaching economic crimes in the Iranian legal system through descriptive and analytical methods. The findings of this study show that the country's judicial system does not have the necessary coherence in this regard. Applying a security-oriented approach in responding to the perpetrators of these crimes has led to its confrontation with the global model of fair trial and deviation from its standards and has limited the right of defendants to defend themselves. Extreme securityism is corrupt in the long run, regardless of human rights standards. It requires the existence of a coherent and differential criminal policy, especially in the procedure of these crimes in the organization and the trial, and attention to professionalism in all its dimensions.Economic crimes are one of the major challenges of societies at the national and international levels and have devastating effects on the economic order and security of countries. The security of some economic crimes based on jurisprudential views and hostile discourse towards macroeconomic criminals and the globalization of some new forms of these crimes have led to the use of security-oriented strategies in the process of prosecuting economic crimes in Iran. This study intends to analyze the effects of security-oriented approaches and the challenges they face in teaching economic crimes in the Iranian legal system through descriptive and analytical methods. The findings of this study show that the country's judicial system does not have the necessary coherence in this regard. Applying a security-oriented approach in responding to the perpetrators of these crimes has led to its confrontation with the global model of fair trial and deviation from its standards and has limited the right of defendants to defend themselves. Extreme securityism is corrupt in the long run, regardless of human rights standards. It requires the existence of a coherent and differential criminal policy, especially in the procedure of these crimes in the organization and the trial, and attention to professionalism in all its dimensions.
Jafar Yazdian Jafari
Abstract
In this article I embark on the contrast between individual and national
security in crimes against security. Crimes against the state can be divided
into crimes against existence of state and authority of state. In these crimes
the first victim is the state itself. Crimes against the security are ...
Read More
In this article I embark on the contrast between individual and national
security in crimes against security. Crimes against the state can be divided
into crimes against existence of state and authority of state. In these crimes
the first victim is the state itself. Crimes against the security are located in
the first category. In these crimes accused rights probably are violated by
the state because the state cannot remain neutral. In this regard, firstly I
discuss on the principals of criminal law about crimes against security and
then its legality. Some scholars believe that public interest is a good pretext
to violate the given rights but other scholars firmly assert that no pretext is
welcomed. This research shows that the present criminal regulation of Iran
followed the first approach which has progressed after the revolution
(1979).
Ali Hossein Nadjafi Abrandabadi; Soodabeh Rezvani
Abstract
Preventive detention of mental disorders applies for ensuring public
protection and for preventing potentially dangerous offenders from
reoffending. Former Article 48 and Article 150 of Islamic penal code 1392
are the most important examples of the preventive approach in Iran's law. In
fact, preventive ...
Read More
Preventive detention of mental disorders applies for ensuring public
protection and for preventing potentially dangerous offenders from
reoffending. Former Article 48 and Article 150 of Islamic penal code 1392
are the most important examples of the preventive approach in Iran's law. In
fact, preventive detention is a sort of pre-emptive action for public
protection. In this measure, criminal law is moving from a retributive
approach to a forward-looking approach and applied to pre-crime.
Therefore, the article, examines this approach with emphasis on Article 150
of the Islamic Penal Code of Iran and the United States of America’s and
France's law that are examples of punitive penal policy.
Abdoulali Tavajohi; Ali Dehghani
Volume 1, Issue 3 , July 2013, , Pages 7-34
Abstract
Providing security has been the first aim of the governments— eitherauthoritarian or democratic. Nevertheless, security is such an interpretableword that it sometimes results in different kinds of misinterpretations.Securing this vital element in society needs to be dealt with as a whole andkeep ...
Read More
Providing security has been the first aim of the governments— eitherauthoritarian or democratic. Nevertheless, security is such an interpretableword that it sometimes results in different kinds of misinterpretations.Securing this vital element in society needs to be dealt with as a whole andkeep the government approach away. In the absence of this view, themeaning of security will be assumed as a state security and every action suchas ignoring the fair trial and criminal procedure rules would be justified. Inthis essay, the encounter of the "security-approach" and the well-knownrules of criminal procedure and fair trial will be studied in the light of overviewing one verdict of administrative justice tribunal.
