hasan hajitabar firozjaei
Abstract
In Iranian law, bankruptcy is considered a fault and a form of crime against property and possessions, which has been criminalized for violating the property rights of individuals and disrupting the economic system and public order. However, from a legal point of view, there are various legal challenges ...
Read More
In Iranian law, bankruptcy is considered a fault and a form of crime against property and possessions, which has been criminalized for violating the property rights of individuals and disrupting the economic system and public order. However, from a legal point of view, there are various legal challenges to the rules of procedure governing these crimes, especially in determining the origin of the prosecution, the manner in which the prosecution is initiated, the necessity or non-necessity of issuing a writ of execution, and the observance of civil procedure. Regarding the private aspect, it is discussed in this article and the following results have been obtained: First, the origin of the calculation of the pursuit time lapse must have been the date of the first non-payment of the merchant. Secondly, the criminal aspect of the mentioned crimes requires the issuance of a warrant if the necessary conditions are provided. Third, the claim for damages resulting from the above offenses - except for the rejection of property and rights subject to the offense - requires the observance of the procedures of civil procedure.
Abstract
Emersion of industrial revolution in 19th century A.D, besides economic evolutions of advanced societies, has been accompanied with change or amendment of some current institutes and notions of criminal law. Among these fundamental changes is this fact that about new crimes due to mechanized life, there ...
Read More
Emersion of industrial revolution in 19th century A.D, besides economic evolutions of advanced societies, has been accompanied with change or amendment of some current institutes and notions of criminal law. Among these fundamental changes is this fact that about new crimes due to mechanized life, there is no need to mental element attaining ( subjective interaction), but standard individual behavior is evaluated regardless of delinquent personal features. This theory called typical fault. This paper seeks to examine this issue in criminology perspective and to analyze selection of standard behavior pattern by focusing on theoretical approach of rational selection and through this criminological realization, express the impact of fault basis change in preventing from unintentional crimes incidence or reduction of its severity along with providing its limitations.aaaa preventing from unintentional crimes incidence or reduction of its severity along with providing its limitations.reventing from unintentional crimes incidence or unintentional crimes incidence or
Abstract
The modern criminal law is based upon four key principles: the principle of legality, necessity of committing the act, fault principle and the principle of personal criminal responsibility. In fact, these principles have been arisen to achieve justice in the realm of criminal law. According to the last ...
Read More
The modern criminal law is based upon four key principles: the principle of legality, necessity of committing the act, fault principle and the principle of personal criminal responsibility. In fact, these principles have been arisen to achieve justice in the realm of criminal law. According to the last principle, everyone is responsible only for behavior that is personally committed and no one can be taken to task for other’s behavior. However, a new category called “vicarious criminal liability " has been raised in modern criminal law which seems to contradict with the last principle. Some lawyers arguing that the issue is an exception to the principle of personal criminal responsibility have tried to defend it. The basis of this view is that they were mistaken in understanding the concept of “vicarious criminal liability “. Such mistake in conceptology has given rise to the new mistake on the scope of this type of criminal responsibility. In this article, explaining the common and erroneous interpretation of the concept, we have tried to draw the real concept and scope of this type of criminal responsibility.
